PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2239377

Histological differences between rootlets sectioned during selective posterior rhizotomy by two surgical techniques.

Abstract

During selective posterior rhizotomy, for the treatment of spasticity in infantile cerebral palsy, the rootlets to be divided are chosen by the type of electromyographic response elicited by intraoperative electrical stimulation. Two different surgical techniques were used for exposing the lumbar roots. The first approach was to expose the conus medullaris through a T 12-L 1 laminectomy, while the other approach to the dorsal roots was distally in the cauda equina through a L 2-L 3 to S1 laminectomy. Although the clinical results obtained with either of them are not very different, there is anatomical evidence that suggests that the histological structure of the divided rootlets may be different in the two techniques. We designed our study to determine of a significant difference in the number of large myelinated fibers was found between rootlets divided close to the conus medullaris and those divided distally in the cauda equina. Two groups of five children with spasticity secondary to cerebral palsy where randomly designed to be operated upon by one of the techniques. The divided rootlets were processed with standard histological techniques and the large myelinated fibers were counted on enlarged (40 x) photomicrograph of the rootlet. A significantly (p less than 0.001) larger number of large myelinated axons was found in the rootlets dissected and divided close to the conus medullaris.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J A Lazareff, P F Valencia Mayoral. 1990. Histological differences between rootlets sectioned during selective posterior rhizotomy by two surgical techniques.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01664855

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

What is the true tethered cord syndrome?

INTRODUCTION: The tethered cord syndrome (TCS) is a stretch-induced functional disorder of the spinal cord with its caudal part anchored by an inelastic structure. DISCUSSION: This article clarifies the reversible lesions that occur in the cord segments above any of the inelastic abnormalities. These lesions are found mostly in the lumbosacral cord, occasionally in the cervical cord and closely correlate with clinical findings. Imaging studies alone do not allow accurate diagnosis of the TCS. The authors emphasize the importance of adhering to the physiological terms "tethered cord syndrome" and "tethered spinal cord" to avoid controversies derived from terms that are not based on the pathophysiology of TCS.

Cauda Equina↗

Pacinioma of the cauda equina.

Lesions composed of Pacinian corpuscles or showing Pacinian corpuscle differentiation have usually been described in relation to benign tumours of the peripheral nervous system or reactive hyperplastic processes. On the other hand, mature Pacinian corpuscles have occasionally been detected as part of intraspinal lumbosacral lipomas, a rare developmental anomaly usually associated with spina bifida. A lesion of the cauda equina composed of numerous mature Pacinian corpuscles and nerve fascicles embedded in adipose tissue in association with spina bifida occulta is described in a 5-month-old male with a sacral red papula. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a cord-like mass in the region of the cauda equina, presumably connected to the subcutis. With the exception of a low lying, tethered spinal cord, there was no neurological deficit and the range of motor development was normal. In March 2005, at 17 months, surgery was carried out. A cord of yellow tissue was found running from the subcutis through the bone defect into the lumbosacral spinal canal. Intradurally, it ran parallel to the cauda equina, terminating at the conus medullaris. Fifteen months after the surgery the development of the child was normal. Only two similar cases have been reported so far. Due to their occurrence in the sacrococcygeal region and association with developmental anomalies, they have been regarded as malformations and the term Pacinioma has been suggested. Our case with clusters of Pacinian corpuscles may represent a rare variant of complex intraspinal lumbosacral lipomas, closely related to Paciniomas reported by Bale.

Cauda Equina↗