PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2249417

Information technology and computer-based decision support in diabetic management.

Abstract

This paper describes the application of computer-based techniques within an intelligent, knowledge-based framework to the management of diabetes. The objectives are to structure data collection and storage so that the relevant patient-specific data are collected and made accessible as needed, and to provide clinical decision support on either a day-by-day or longer timescale as appropriate; these objectives relating to both hospital clinic and general practice. For longer-term management, a prototype rule set (greater than 500 rules) has been developed (coded in Sigma PROLOG), validated and tested on patient data. The data collection programs (written in SCULPTOR) to feed the ruleset have been tested in the hospital clinic and compared with the resident data collection system for usability, and impact on the running of the clinic. Links between the data collection programs and the ruleset program have been written and tested. The computer system will also incorporate a module, combining knowledge-based advisory system and glucose/insulin model as patient simulator, that can be tested as a potential decision aid for adjusting insulin dosage on a daily basis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E R Carson, S Carey, F E Harvey, P H Sonksen, S Till, C D Williams. Information technology and computer-based decision support in diabetic management.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2607(90)90100-n

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗