PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2261556

Junior doctors' on call activities: differences in workload and work patterns among grades.

N B Turnbull·N A Miles·I W Gallen
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the workload and work patterns of junior doctors of all grades while on call. DESIGN: Pilot study of activity data self recorded by junior doctors, with the help of students during busy periods. SETTING: A general surgical firm and a general medical firm based at University Hospital, Nottingham. SUBJECTS: Four registrars, three senior house officers, and five preregistration house officers. RESULTS: Senior house officers and preregistration house officers spent nearly half of all their on call duty time working, but less than half of that time was spent in direct contact with patients. Registrars were on call more often than the house officers but spent less than one fifth of their on call duty time working, and almost two thirds of that time was spent in direct contact with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Workload while on duty is excessive for both senior and preregistration house officers. Changes in some administrative procedures and employment of more non-medical staff during on call periods might reduce the time spent on non-clinical activities, thereby reducing the overall workload and allowing more time for patient contact.

Explore related subjects

EnglandHospital Bed Capacity, 500 and overMedical Staff, HospitalPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingPhysician-Patient RelationsPilot ProjectsTask Performance and AnalysisTime and Motion StudiesJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N B Turnbull, N A Miles, I W Gallen. 1990-11-24. Junior doctors' on call activities: differences in workload and work patterns among grades.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.301.6762.1191

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Health inequalities in Scotland and England: the contrasting journeys of ideas from research into policy.

Both the UK's Labour Government and Scotland's devolved Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition Executive have committed themselves to reducing health inequalities. Furthermore, both institutions have emphasised the importance of using evidence to inform policy responses. In light of such political commitments, a significant amount of work has been undertaken in the field of health inequalities in order to: (i) review the available research evidence; (ii) assess the extent to which policies have been based on this research evidence; and (iii) evaluate the success (or failure) of policies to tackle health inequalities. Yet so far only limited attention has been given to exploring how key actors involved in research-policy dialogues understand the processes involved. In an attempt to address this gap, this article draws on data from semi-structured interviews with 58 key actors in the field of health inequalities research and policymaking in the UK to argue that it is ideas, rather than research evidence, which have travelled from research into policy. The descriptions of the varying journeys of these ideas fit three types--successful, partial and fractured--each of which is outlined with reference to one example. The paper then employs existing theories about research-policy relations and the movement of ideas in an attempt to illuminate and better understand the contrasting journeys. In the concluding discussion, it is argued that the third approach, which focuses on the entrepreneurial processes involved in the marketing of ideas, is most helpful in understanding the research findings, but that this needs to be discussed in relation to the political context within which negotiations take place.

England↗