PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2264016

Impression technique for RPDs. A comparison between two methods.

Abstract

The purposes of this study were threefold, 1) to develop a method for comparing various impression techniques and materials, 2) to compare the extension of impressions with ZOE-paste and silicone, and 3) to evaluate the precision for each method. A special device was constructed in order to secure an identical position of the impression trays. The results indicated that ZOE-paste impression in a border moulded tray produced more extended impressions lingually but buccally there were no difference between the chosen materials/method. No differences in precision of the two methods could be measured.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Gunne, J Högström, H Nilson. 1990. Impression technique for RPDs. A comparison between two methods.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2264016/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Making a custom tray for elastomeric impression materials without a primary cast.

The custom tray is recommended for impressions in which it is desirable to establish precise borders, such as Kennedy class I maxillary partial dentures, where an accurate postpalatal seal is a requirement. The peripheries, including the postpalatal seal, can be established with a high degree of accuracy with a custom tray. A procedure is described that does not require a primary impression or a primary cast to make a custom tray for elastomeric impression materials.

Dental Impression Materials