PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2274803

Professional interface with mutual-aid self-help groups: a review.

Abstract

The ideal interface between self-help group and professional being of both theoretical and practical interest, this paper reviews the conceptual underpinnings of the interface issue and empirical studies in which the professional or self-help group member perspective on this issue was elicited or comparative analyses were conducted. Empirical studies measuring self-help group members' perceptions and studies of professionals' views indicate that professional interaction with self-help groups is desirable but that professional lack of information concerning self-help groups and lack of preparation for appropriate roles are perceived as barriers to such interaction. These studies clearly show that the indirect, non-authoritarian role of the professional as consultant receives the most support. Consultation and collaboration are recurrent themes in the empirical investigations of the professional interface with self-help groups. Balance and exchange theories could provide useful theoretical foundations for this collaborative practice. Clearly, educational preparation is needed to enable health professionals to embark on the essential transition from provider to partner with self-help groups.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Stewart. 1990. Professional interface with mutual-aid self-help groups: a review.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(90)90236-l

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗