PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2276262

Computer-critiqued blood ordering using the HELP system.

Abstract

Recently the medical risk of blood transfusions has emphasized the need to improve the safe use of blood products. For the past 2 1/2 years at LDS Hospital we have used the HELP computer system to assist and critique ordering of blood products "on-line" by physicians and nurses. This report details the computer methods used to order blood products and to critique the appropriateness of those orders. Physicians personally enter the orders for more than 45% of the blood products using computer terminals, whereas 7% are from physician standing orders. Nurses enter the remaining orders from written orders (26%), verbal orders (14%), and phone orders (8%). There were 3396 blood orders for 1043 patients generated by 273 physicians during the fourth quarter of 1989. Each order is justified at the time it is entered by selecting from a menu of physician-approved criteria. The criteria are linked to supportive data in the data base, i.e., laboratory results and clinical data. The computer verified that 82% of these orders met criteria. Quality Assurance nurses verified the remaining 18%. Of these 18% only one in eight required manual chart review. After computer and Quality Assurance review, only eight (0.24%) of the orders were found to be true exceptions to established criteria. Physicians and nurses have accepted the computerized critiquing system. Through use of the computer we provide "on-line" critiquing and improve the use of scarce blood product resources.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R M Gardner, O K Golubjatnikov, R M Laub, J T Jacobson, R S Evans. 1990. Computer-critiqued blood ordering using the HELP system.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4809(90)90038-e

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Regional transfusion centre preoperative autologous blood donation programme: the first two years.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a regional autologous blood donation programme. DESIGN: Clinical and laboratory data were collected and stored prospectively. Transfusion data were collected retrospectively from hospital blood bank records. SETTING: Northern Region Blood Transfusion Service and 14 hospitals within the Northern Regional Health Authority. SUBJECTS: 505 patients referred for autologous blood donation before elective surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient eligibility, adverse events from donation, autologous blood units provided, and autologous and allogeneic blood units transfused within 10 days of operation. RESULTS: Of 505 patients referred, 354 donated at least one unit. 78 of 151 referred patients who did not donate were excluded at the autologous clinic, mostly because of anaemia or ischaemic heart disease. In 73 cases the patient, general practitioner, or hospital consultant decided against donation. 363 autologous procedures were undertaken. In 213 (59%) cases all requested units were provided. The most common reasons for incomplete provision were late referral or anaemia. Adverse events accompanied 24 of 928 donations (2.6%). Transfusion data were obtained for 357 of the 363 procedures. 281 donors were transfused; autologous blood only was given to 225, autologous and allogeneic blood was given to 52, and allogeneic blood only was given to four. 648 of 902 (72%) units of autologous blood were transfused. Complete provision of requested autologous units was followed by allogeneic transfusion in 12 of 208 procedures (5.8%). Incomplete provision was followed by allogeneic transfusion in 44 of 149 procedures (30%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the feasibility of a regional autologous transfusion programme. Autologous donors only infrequently received allogeneic transfusion. Patients should be appropriately selected and referred early.

Blood Banks