PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2286044

Quantifying image quality.

P F Sharp
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The measurement of image quality is an essential stage in the evaluation of imaging techniques. Yet there is no accepted way of quantitatively assessing image quality. Current theories suggest that the quality of the raw data acquired by the device can be assessed independently from that of the displayed image. In this paper the various experimental techniques suitable for making psychometric measurements of displayed image quality are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Diagnostic ImagingHumansTechnology, RadiologicJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P F Sharp. 1990. Quantifying image quality.. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0815%2F11%2F4a%2F303

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

[Quality control of radiographic imaging of the lumbar spine].

The qualitative control of the roentgenographic findings was performed independently by the assessment of five x-ray specialists on 40 two-directional lumbosacral roentgenograms. The findings were based on questioners including all details and a table of the internationally used "Radiological Diagnosis". In earlier publications the anatomical and structural changes were considered the risk factors of the waist. (Osteoporosis, changes in the position of the vertebral body, change in the shape of the spine, restriction of the intervertebral cleft and deformation of the small articulations). The views of the research workers were compared by means of statistical analysis. Compared with other authors the methods of these findings are in agreement with the international norms. These findings drew attention to the necessity of an objective assessment of the subjective findings.

Diagnostic Imaging↗
PubMed1992

[Imaging of the spine].

Modern imaging techniques allow early and precise diagnosis of spinal diseases. Their sensitivity and specificity are variable, but in general they are more complementary than competitive. After emphasizing the different patterns which characterize the late evolution of diagnostic imaging, the author reviews the indications and limits of plain films, bone scintigraphy, computed tomography, and in particular of magnetic resonance, in trauma, degenerative lesions, inflammations, infections and tumors of the spine.

Diagnostic Imaging↗