PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2304436

Tradition v Project 2000--something old, something new.

Abstract

Simple introduction of Project 2000 will not, of itself, lead to improved standards of nursing or to better retention of staff. The author believes that senior nursing staff may well revert to traditional ego-defensive stances when faced with new problem-solving learners. Implementation of Project 2000 may lead to worsening relationships, entrenchment of already hardened attitudes, increased role conflict for junior nurses, with a resultant loss of job satisfaction and increased wastage. Some conflict areas which exist in nursing are discussed. It is argued that the attitudes a learner holds towards significant others can be correlated with degrees of role conflict and that role conflict can affect job satisfaction, while loss of job satisfaction can result in wastage. Recommendations regarding action which should be taken prior to implementation of Project 2000 are outlined and conclusions drawn regarding possible outcomes.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J G Orr. 1990. Tradition v Project 2000--something old, something new.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-6917(90)90140-l

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗