PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2318368

Patient-centredness in the consultation. 2: Does it really make a difference?

Abstract

The major purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that patient-centredness in the consultation was associated with improved patient outcomes. Patient-centred care was defined as care in which the doctor responded to the patient in such a way as to allow the patient to express all of his or her reasons for coming, including: symptoms, thoughts, feelings and expectations. The study took place in the offices of six family doctors. All consultations were audiotaped and the patients completed a questionnaire and two structured interviews with the investigator: one immediately following the consultation and the other two weeks later. Patient-centredness was found to be associated with the doctor having ascertained the patient's reasons for coming and with resolution of the patient's concerns. It was also associated with the patient feeling understood and resolution of the patient's symptoms until confounding variables were controlled. The results of the multivariate analysis suggested that the impact of a patient-centred approach may be part of a package of care, consisting of a doctor whose overall practice allows for the development of personal relationships with patients over time through continuity of care.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R J Henbest, M Stewart. 1990. Patient-centredness in the consultation. 2: Does it really make a difference?. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra%2F7.1.28

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗