PubMed · 2343049
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C G Bloe. 1990. Peritoneal dialysis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2343049/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Severe limitations in biocompatibility of conventional peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDF) can be partially attributed to the presence of glucose degradation products (GDP), which are generated during autoclaving of PDF. Formation of GDP can be significantly reduced by the use of multi-chamber bag systems. Recent clinical studies have revealed increased dialysate levels of pro-collagen I C-terminal peptide (PICP) in patients dialyzed with these solutions. Here, we briefly review the current knowledge on various aspects of GDP toxicity toward peritoneal cells and analyze the impact of GDP on PICP release by human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC) in vitro. METHODS: HPMC were exposed to a mixture of known GDP added to culture medium at clinically relevant doses. After 12 days, the amount of PICP released was measured using an immunoassay. Furthermore, the protein synthesis was assessed by 3H-proline incorporation in HPMC exposed to peritoneal effluent obtained from patients after three months of CAPD with either conventional PDF or low-GDP solution. RESULTS: Exposure to GDP resulted in a significant decrease in PICP release by HPMC. In addition, the synthesis of new proteins secreted by HPMC was preserved significantly better in HPMC treated with effluent obtained when patients were dialyzed with low-GDP solutions rather than conventional PDF. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to GDP may impair protein synthesis and secretion by HPMC. Therefore, increased dialysate PICP levels in response to GDP-free PDF may be viewed as evidence of improved mesothelial cell function.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
INTRODUCTION: Every week, haemodialysis patients are exposed to approximately 400 l of water used for the production of dialysis fluids which, albeit with the interposition of a semi-permeable artificial membrane, come into direct contact with the bloodstream. It is therefore clearly important to know and monitor the chemical and microbiological purity of dialysis water. METHODS: In this review, we analyse the sources of chemical and microbiological water contamination, and the problems involved in water purification systems and modalities. We also analyse the compliance of dialysis units with the microbiological standards established by the most widely accepted guidelines relating to the quality of dialysis fluids. RESULTS: The risk of chemical contamination is due mainly to the primary pollution of municipal water, whereas the most important microbiological problem is the control of bacterial growth in the water treatment and distribution system. Dialysis water treatment implies various levels of pre-treatment, a final purification module (which, in many cases, is reverse osmosis: RO) and a hydraulic circuit for the distribution of the purified water. RO-based treatment systems produce water of optimal chemical and microbial quality, and so dialysis units need to concentrate on maintaining this quality level in the long term by means of effective maintenance and disinfection strategies. The most widely accepted standards for water purity are those recommended by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the European Pharmacopea, which respectively allow bacterial growth of <200 and <100 c.f.u./ml, and an endotoxin concentration of <2 and <0.25 IU/ml. However, a number of multicentre studies have reported that 7-35% of water samples have bacterial growth of >200 c.f.u./ml, and up to 44% have endotoxin levels of >5 IU/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The results of multicentre studies indicate that the microbial quality of dialysis fluids is still a too often neglected problem, particularly as there is evidence of a possible relationship between dialysis fluid contamination and long-term morbidity. The time has now come to take advantage of innovations in water treatment processes and improvements in dialysis machines in order to modify clinical practices and start improvement processes aimed at decreasing the risk of microbial contamination to the minimum, as it has already been successfully done in the case of chemical contamination.