PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2357324

Burn shock.

Abstract

The approach to fluid resuscitation in burn shock continues to be refined in step with improved knowledge of the complex fluid, electrolyte, and protein shifts that characterize this form of shock. Local burn tissue and generalized nonburn tissue edema occur initially after injury because of the release of histamine, which causes increased microvascular permeability. Subsequent edema formation in burned and nonburned tissue occurs according to distinctly different mechanisms. Burn tissue edema forms because of direct thermal injury to endothelial cells and increased burn tissue osmolarity. Nonburn tissue edema is attributed to severe hypoproteinemia caused by protein flux into burn-injured tissue. Interstitial protein depletion in nonburn tissue also increases the ease of water transport into the interstitial space. Cell damage occurs with ischemia caused by decreased perfusion. More cell damage can occur with reperfusion and the subsequent formation of oxygen radicals. Fluid therapy is designed to support the patient's cardiovascular system so as to restore and maintain tissue perfusion. General formulas serve as guidelines for the amount of fluid to infuse; however, fluid therapy should be tailored to the individual patient's needs based on factors such as extensiveness of burns, extremes of age, inhalation injury, pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease, and delayed fluid resuscitation. Ringer's lactate solution is the most common fluid used in the early postburn period. The addition of colloid to resuscitation efforts should begin as microvascular permeability is restored or immediately if the patient presents in frank shock. Continuous monitoring is necessary to judge the adequacy of fluid replacement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E V Robins. 1990. Burn shock.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2357324/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comprehensive Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes and Immune Infiltration in Burn Injury: Key Biomarkers and Pathways.

BACKGROUND: Burn injuries trigger complex immune responses and gene expression changes, impacting wound healing and systemic inflammation. Understanding these changes is crucial for identifying biomarkers and therapeutic targets. METHODS: We analyzed two gene expression omnibus datasets (wound tissue [GSE8056] and blood [GSE37069]) to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in burn injury samples versus controls. Immune cell proportions were assessed using CIBERSORT. Functional enrichment analyses (Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and protein-protein interaction networks were constructed to identify key genes and pathways. RESULTS: We identified 1170 upregulated and 1227 downregulated DEGs. Gene Ontology analysis revealed enrichment in neutrophil activation, inflammatory response, and extracellular matrix organization. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis highlighted cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, TNF, and IL-17 signaling pathways. Immune infiltration analysis showed significant changes in neutrophils, macrophages (M1/M2), and T-cell subsets. Protein-protein interaction network analysis identified five hub genes: JUN, STAT1, Bcl2, MMP9, and TLR2. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive bioinformatic analysis of gene expression and immune responses in burn injuries. The identified DEGs, hub genes, and pathways offer insights into the immune response mechanisms and suggest potential targets for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in burn injury management.

Burns↗