PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2368101

Cognitive changes in patients with multiple cerebral infarcts.

Abstract

Consensus has not been achieved regarding the impact of multiple cerebral infarcts on neurobehavioral status. To evaluate cognitive function in patients with multiple cerebral infarcts, we administered a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery to 23 consecutive male patients with clinical and brain computed tomographic findings consistent with at least two separate areas of cerebral infarction. Based on brain computed tomographic findings, patients were classified as having either mixed (n = 12) or lacunar (n = 11) infarcts. Results of these two groups were compared with those of 11 age-, sex-, and education-matched controls with no clinical or brain computed tomographic evidence of cerebrovascular disease. The mixed group had significantly lower mean scores than the controls for every cognitive domain tested. The lacune group showed cognitive impairment on most neuropsychological measures but did not differ from the controls in the attention domain. Although some degree of cognitive impairment was detected by the neuropsychological test battery in virtually every patient, only seven of 23 (30%) had Mini-Mental State Examination scores indicating dementia (less than 24). We conclude that virtually every patient with multiple cerebral infarcts has some degree of cognitive impairment but that only a minority can be classified as demented if the Mini-Mental State Examination is used as the primary defining examination.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V L Babikian, N Wolfe, R Linn, J E Knoefel, M L Albert. 1990. Cognitive changes in patients with multiple cerebral infarcts.. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.21.7.1013

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A low glycaemic index breakfast cereal preferentially prevents children's cognitive performance from declining throughout the morning.

This study investigated whether the glycaemic index (GI) of breakfast cereal differentially affects children's attention and memory. Using a balanced cross-over design, on two consecutive mornings 64 children aged 6-11 years were given a high GI cereal and a low GI cereal in a counterbalanced order. They performed a series of computerised tests of attention and memory, once prior to breakfast and three times following breakfast at hourly intervals. The results indicate that children's performance declines throughout the morning and that this decline can be significantly reduced following the intake of a low GI cereal as compared with a high GI cereal on measures of accuracy of attention (M=-6.742 and -13.510, respectively, p<0.05) and secondary memory (M=-30.675 and -47.183, respectively, p<0.05).

Attention↗

Inhibitory control test is a simple method to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES: To compare inhibitory control test (ICT), a simple/rapid test of attention, to a standard psychometric battery (SPT) to diagnose minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) and predict development of overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: Fifty nonalcoholic cirrhotics and 50 age/educational-status-matched controls were given ICT and SPT in the same sitting. Performance impaired beyond two standard deviations of controls was considered MHE in cirrhotics. ICT results (lure/target response and lures/person) were compared between controls and cirrhotics and within cirrhotics with/without MHE. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis was used to study ICT for MHE diagnosis. Twenty subjects were administered SPT and ICT twice to assess test-retest reliability. All cirrhotics were followed routinely for the development of OHE. RESULTS: Cirrhotics performed worse than controls on SPT and ICT. Using SPT, 39 cirrhotics had MHE. ICT was administered faster than SPT (15 vs 37 min). Cirrhotics with MHE had significantly higher lure (28%vs 3%) and lower target response (91%vs 96%) compared with those without MHE. Lure/person >5 had 90% sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis. AUC for receiver-operating characteristic for lures alone was 95.8%. Lure and target responses were highly correlated (r= 0.9) between sessions showing high test-retest reliability. Five (10%) patients developed OHE on f/u of 26 +/- 10 months; all five had been diagnosed with MHE using ICT and SPT. None of the five patients with discordant results on SPT and ICT developed OHE. CONCLUSIONS: ICT has good sensitivity/specificity for MHE diagnosis, is reliable and is equivalent to SPT for predicting OHE development.

Attention↗