PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2379331

Liposuction and anesthesia.

R S Narins
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Dermatologists have been performing liposuction surgery safely since it was first introduced in the United States. Dermatologic surgeons have been in the forefront of development of new machines and cannulas and have safely adapted the procedure to an office surgical setting. They have made important contributions with the introduction of high volume dilute lidocaine/epinephrine solutions for local infiltration, in many cases using these solutions as the only anesthesia. The safety record for dermatologic surgeons performing liposuction has been excellent.

Explore related subjects

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia, LocalEpinephrineHumansLidocaineLipectomyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R S Narins. 1990. Liposuction and anesthesia.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2379331/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Postanesthetic recumbency associated with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis in a quarter horse.

Anesthesia and surgery in a Quarter Horse affected with hyperkalemic periodic paralysis resulted in euthanasia after 7 days of postoperative recumbency. Initial recovery was uneventful after extensive sinus surgery, but within 2 hours, the horse had severe muscle weakness. Plasma electrolyte concentrations were within the normal range during the period of recumbency. There was no clinical or laboratory evidence of severe muscle damage. Despite treatment with acetazolamide, isoproterenol, and intensive nursing, the horse was unable to stand for more than a few seconds and developed severe decubital ulcers. Ultrastructural examination revealed nemaline rods and swollen mitochondria in disrupted myofibers.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1992

[Cerebral complications and general anesthesia].

Postoperative cerebral dysfunction is usually assumed to be a consequence of anaesthesia. Temporary postoperative confusion is quite common. This review points out that the anaesthetic technique is clinically relevant for mental dysfunction only in the few hours immediately following operation. Of primary importance are the preoperative state of the patient, the drugs used in the perioperative period, the type and duration of the operation, the technique of postoperative analgesia and sedation and the postoperative clinical course of the patient. Cerebral infarction is a very severe but rather rare complication which occurs mainly after the operation. The incidence of perioperative cerebral infarction is about 1% in 65-year-old patients and increases with higher age. An asymptomatic preoperative carotid bruit is not a risk factor; therefore, invasive investigations are not warranted. The most frequent cause for cerebral insults are emboli. Intraoperative hypotensive periods are very rarely responsible for cerebral insults. Peripheral and central nervous lesions due to positioning of the patient for the operation occur not frequently and are certainly an avoidable neurologic complication. Hypoxic cerebral damages are usually the consequence of anaesthetic mismanagement. Today they are very rare, due to modern monitoring techniques.

Anesthesia, General↗