PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2401695

Coordinated strategies in burn prevention programs: a case study.

Abstract

Smoke alarm giveaway programs can be successful, as demonstrated by the experience of the extensive 1982 Baltimore Fire Department project. In the absence of municipal government commitment for such an intensive campaign, a community program that involves many sectors can also be successful. It may, in fact, reach elements of the high-risk population who do not traditionally participate in smoke detector programs, such as renters. A decrease in "extra-alarm" fires and fire deaths can be achieved with multifaceted programs. In Dade County, with a growing population of approximately 1.7 million people that includes large migrant and illegal alien populations, fire-related deaths decreased from 26 in 1985 and 27 in 1986 to 17 in 1987. In the city of Miami, the county's inner core, fire-related deaths decreased by half from 1985 to 1987, in spite of an increase in high-risk population groups and substandard housing. Thus through extensive networking, the integrated efforts of a cross-section of the community can result in a successful safety campaign that has little overhead or political constraints. Designed as multifaceted, ongoing community-based programs, such efforts can, over time and through "persistent learning," lead to desired changes in behavior.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Hammond, R Varas. Coordinated strategies in burn prevention programs: a case study.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199007000-00021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Corporate financial decision-makers' perceptions of workplace safety.

This study, through a random national survey, explored how senior financial executives or managers (those who determined high-level budget, resource allocation, and corporate priorities) of medium-to-large companies perceive important workplace safety issues. The three top-rated safety priorities in resource allocation reported by the participants (overexertion, repetitive motion, and bodily reaction) were consistent with the top three perceived causes of workers' compensation losses. The greatest single safety concerns reported were overexertion, repetitive motion, highway accidents, falling on the same level and bodily reaction. A majority of participants believed that the indirect costs associated with workplace injury were higher than the direct costs. Our participants believed that money spent improving workplace safety would have significant returns. The perceived top benefits of an effective workplace safety program were increased productivity, reduced cost, retention, and increased satisfaction among employees. The perceived most important safety modification was safety training. The top reasons senior financial executives gave for believing their safety programs were better than those at other companies were that their companies paid more attention to and emphasized safety, they had better classes and training focused on safety, and they had teams/individuals focused specifically on safety.

Accident Prevention↗