PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2405962

Effects of computers on nursing resource use. Do computers save nurses time?

Abstract

The effects of information systems on nursing resource use are reviewed. The information systems in place in various hospitals differ in major ways; some have an impact on nursing resource use while others do not. Evidence is strong and consistent that computer systems that manage flow of information between nursing units and ancillary departments save time for nurses. The reported findings may even understate the case because workload may have increased during the period of the studies. There is also strong, but unreplicated, evidence that a work plan or electronic Kardex for each patient saves time at report. If nurses are paid for overtime, these savings can translate into cost savings for hospitals. On the other hand, systems that emphasize on-line charting and not communications do not save time. Bedside terminals are too new to have been subjected to careful research by independent investigators, but early reports, which primarily come from vendors, indicate that bedside terminals may further save time and reduce errors. More systematic research into effects of various components is needed to fully document the effect of computers on nurses' time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Hendrickson, C T Kovner. Effects of computers on nursing resource use. Do computers save nurses time?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2405962/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗