PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2406395

Prescriptive authority and nurse-midwives.

B J Moon
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of issues relevant to the question of prescriptive authority for nurse-midwives. Nurse-midwives can be held liable for prescriptive competency as evidenced by the American College of Nurse-Midwives' statements, physician delegation of prescribing privileges, and recent court rulings. Despite this liability, nurse-midwives are denied legally sanctioned authority if they are not granted prescriptive privilege by specific legislation. This discussion concludes with a position in favor of direct prescriptive authority, regulated by boards of nursing, for all nurse-midwives in order to remove unnecessary restrictions to the practice of an important member of the health-care team.

Explore related subjects

Drug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansNurse MidwivesProfessional PracticeJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B J Moon. Prescriptive authority and nurse-midwives.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-2182(90)90058-d

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Clicking for pills.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed2007

Safe prescribing.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Drug Prescriptions↗
PubMed2007

Provision of pain management by a pharmacist with prescribing authority.

PURPOSE: The clinical and financial outcomes of a pain clinic managed by a pharmacist with prescribing authority are described. SUMMARY: Pharmacist clinicians in a for-profit, integrated health system recently received permission to bill for their services in certain ambulatory clinics. A pharmacist clinician, who had an individual Drug Enforcement Administration number and whose services are billable under New Mexico law, was chosen to assume the medication management responsibilities in a clinic where 90% of the patient population is treated for chronic non-cancer-related pain. No additional personnel were needed, and no additional space was required, eliminating overhead for the space and utilities needed for operating a new clinic. With the ability to bill for the pharmacist clinician's services, a new model for justification of clinical pharmacy services was developed for the ambulatory care clinics. The revenue generated was tracked by a medical billing system, and clinical outcomes were tracked using the clinic's database for patients' individual visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. Between June 2004 and June 2005, an average of 18 patients were seen by the pharmacist clinician each day. The clinic generated 107,550 dollars of actual revenue and saved the health plan over 450,000 dollars. There was a consistent decrease in mean VAS pain scores with continued visits. CONCLUSION: Patients with chronic non-cancer-related pain were managed effectively by a pharmacist with prescribing authority and refill authorization in a pain management clinic. The favorable clinical outcomes, revenue generated, and cost savings achieved justified the pharmacist clinician's services in this health system.

Drug Prescriptions↗