PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2406521

Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty.

Abstract

In the technique of percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty, one or more large balloons are inserted percutaneously and then inflated across a stenotic valve to decrease the degree of obstruction. Currently, the procedure is being performed for patients with pulmonic, mitral, or aortic stenosis. The results vary according to the type of valve and the age of the patient. In patients with pulmonic stenosis, balloon valvuloplasty can be performed safely and the results are excellent. Therefore, at many institutions it is the procedure of choice for the treatment of isolated pulmonic stenosis. In patients with mitral stenosis, the results depend on the morphologic features of the stenotic valve. In patients with highly calcified and fibrotic mitral valve leaflets, the risks of the procedure are increased and the results are suboptimal. In experienced hands, however, balloon valvuloplasty is excellent for patients with a pliable, noncalcified mitral valve or those for whom operation imposes an extremely high risk. The use of balloon valvuloplasty for aortic stenosis has been limited to the frail, elderly patient who either is not a surgical candidate or is at high risk for operation. Although mortality and restenosis rates are high on short-term follow-up, aortic balloon valvuloplasty provides palliation of symptoms in many patients who otherwise would have been unable to undergo any intervention. Long-term follow-up is necessary for determining the ultimate role of balloon valvuloplasty in cardiology.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Nishimura, D R Holmes, G S Reeder. 1990. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-6196(12)65015-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Transvalvular Flow Rate is Associated With Mortality Rate and Lifetime Loss in Aortic Valve Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.

Low-flow states are associated with adverse outcomes in aortic stenosis (AS), but the prognostic value of transvalvular flow rate (TFR) has not been consistently established across studies. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies (published by November 14, 2025) comparing low versus normal TFR in AS. Data were collected from Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Survival was assessed using pooled Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression, flexible parametric survival models, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis. A total of 9 studies including 6,494 patients were analyzed; 2,575 (39.7%) had low TFR. At 8 years of follow-up, estimated survival was 34.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.7% to 47%) in the low-TFR group and 63% (95% CI 58.9% to 67.4%) in the normal-TFR group. Low TFR was associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.59, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.74, p < 0.001). We observed a progressively greater hazard over time, with the hazard ratio approaching 1.9 by 8 years. At 8 years, RMST in the normal-TFR group was 7.37 years (95% CI 7.21 to 7.53 years) versus 5.07 years (95% CI 4.91 to 5.23 years) in the low-TFR group, representing a lifetime loss of 2.3 years in the low-TFR group (&#x394;RMST -2.30 years, 95% CI -2.53 to -2.07 years, p < 0.001). In patients with AS, low TFR is associated with significantly higher mortality and lifetime loss. These findings support TFR as a clinically meaningful marker for risk stratification in AS.

Aortic Valve Stenosis↗

Implantation of the CoreValve percutaneous aortic valve.

Surgical aortic valve replacement is the only recommended treatment for significant aortic valve stenosis. Percutaneous aortic valve replacement appears to be a novel option for high-risk patients. We report the implantation of the ReValving system (CoreValve, Paris, France) in a 64-year-old woman who was refused aortic valve replacement surgery for critical aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction because of severe pulmonary fibrosis. After anesthesia, the patient was put on femorofemoral cardiopulmonary bypass, and underwent a balloon valvuloplasty with subsequent retrograde aortic valve replacement by the ReValving system. Transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of the patient's hemodynamics showed immediate improvements of the valvular area and left ventricular ejection fraction and only traces of paravalvular leaks. The patient was easily weaned from ventilation and resumed activity soon after the surgery. A multidisciplinary approach is presently necessary to offer a reliable and safe procedure.

Aortic Valve Stenosis↗