Theophylline down-regulates adenosine receptor function.

J Mally; J H Connick; T W Stone

doi:10.1016/0006-8993(90)90321-2

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2407315

Theophylline down-regulates adenosine receptor function.

J Mally·J H Connick·T W Stone

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Chronic treatment of animals with caffeine or theophylline has been reported to increase the number of adenosine receptors in the CNS detected by ligand binding, but few functional studies have been performed. In the present study adenosine enhanced depolarising responses to the excitatory amino acid N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) in slices of mouse cerebral cortex. This effect was blocked acutely by theophylline but not by theophylline given 24 h previously. Twenty-four hours after 2 weeks of treatment with this antagonist, however (10 or 100 mg/kg/day) adenosine was no longer effective, sensitivity recovering subsequently. Theophylline treatment also reduced sensitivity to (-)-isoprenaline but not 5-hydroxytryptamine. It is concluded that changes of adenosine receptor number in the brain do not necessarily reflect the induced changes of receptor function.

Explore related subjects

Adenosine Animals Aspartic Acid Isoproterenol Male Mice N-Methylaspartate Receptors, Purinergic Serotonin Theophylline Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

J Mally, J H Connick, T W Stone. 1990-02-12. Theophylline down-regulates adenosine receptor function.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90321-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1996

Activation of adenosine receptors before ischemia enhances tolerance against myocardial stunning in the rabbit heart.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether stimulation of adenosine receptors before ischemia enhances myocardial resistance to stunning in vivo. BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated the attenuation of myocardial stunning by ischemic preconditioning through adenosine receptor activation in rabbits. METHODS: 1) To confirm the efficacy of an intravenous infusion of adenosine to stimulate adenosine receptors in the heart, we assessed the effect of an adenosine infusion on the inotropic response to an isoproterenol challenge. 2) Myocardial stunning was induced by 10 min of coronary occlusion and reperfusion. The regional thickening fraction was monitored by an epicardial Doppler sensor. Rabbits were pretreated with either no drug (control group), adenosine, 8-phenyltheophylline or a combination of 8-phenyltheophylline plus adenosine. RESULTS: An intravenous infusion of adenosine at 0.15 mg/kg body weight per min attenuated by 50% the elevation of left ventricular dP/dtmax by isoproterenol (0.075 microgram/kg per min). The same dose of adenosine infused for 15 min before ischemia significantly improved the postischemic recovery of the thickening fraction, and the thickening fraction at 30 min reperfusion was 76.8 +/- 3.3% (mean +/- SE) of the baseline value, which was significantly higher than the control value (42.9 +/- 4.5%). The relation between thickening fraction and systolic left ventricular pressure after reperfusion was shifted toward higher thickening fraction by adenosine. This beneficial effect of adenosine was not detected in rabbits given 8-phenyltheophylline before adenosine, and 8-phenyltheophylline-treated rabbits showed a time course of thickening fraction similar to that in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: An intravenous infusion of adenosine is capable of protecting rabbit hearts against stunning through adenosine receptor activation.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1996

Significance of insulin for glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle during contractions.

Glucose uptake rate in active skeletal muscles is markedly increased during exercise. This increase reflects a multifactorial process involving both local and systemic mechanisms that cooperate to stimulate glucose extraction and glucose delivery to the muscle cells. Increased glucose extraction is effected primarily via mechanisms exerted within the muscle cell related to the contractile activity per se. Yet contractions become a more potent stimulus of muscle glucose uptake as the plasma insulin level is increased. In addition, enhanced glucose delivery to muscle, which during exercise is essentially effected via increased blood flow, significantly contributes to stimulate glucose uptake. Again, however, increased glucose delivery appears to be a more potent stimulus of muscle glucose uptake as the circulating insulin level is increased. Furthermore, contractions and elevated flow prove to be additive stimuli of muscle glucose uptake at any plasma insulin level. In conclusion, the extent to which muscle glucose uptake is stimulated during exercise depends on various factors, including 1) the intensity of the contractile activity, 2) the magnitude of the exercise-associated increase in muscle blood flow, and 3) the circulating insulin level.

Adenosine↗

PubMed1995

A base substitution within the GTPase-associated domain of mammalian 28 S ribosomal RNA causes high thiostrepton accessibility.

A molecular basis for the insensitivity of eukaryotic ribosomes to the antibiotic thiostrepton was investigated using synthetic 100-nucleotide-long fragments covering the GTPase domain of 23/28 S rRNA. Filter binding assay showed no detectable binding of the rat RNA to thiostrepton, but the binding capacity was markedly increased by base substitution of G1878 to A at the position corresponding to 1067 of Escherichia coli 23 S rRNA. The association constant (K alpha) for the rat A 1878 mutant was 0.60 x 10(6) M-1, which was comparable with that of the E. coli RNA (K alpha = 1.1 x 10(6) M-1). This suggests that the eukaryotic G 1878 participates in the resistance for thiostrepton. On the other hand, the RNA fragments of the two species had a similar binding capacity for E. coli ribosomal protein L11 and its mammalian homologue L12. Gel electrophoresis under a high ionic condition, however, revealed a difference between the two proteins. E. coli L11 formed stable complexes with both the E. coli RNA and the rat A 1878 mutant RNA in the presence of thiostrepton, while rat L12 failed to exhibit such complex formation. This suggests that the eukaryotic L12 protein may also be an element giving the resistance for thiostrepton. These results are discussed in terms of preserved three-dimensional conformation of the RNA backbone between prokaryotes and higher eukaryotes.

Adenosine↗