PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2468357

Relative stability of parallel- and antiparallel-stranded duplex DNA.

Abstract

We have recently shown that DNA containing homopolymeric A-T base pairs can form a parallel-stranded intramolecular duplex [van de Sande et al. (1988) Science (Washington, D.C.) 241, 551-557]. In the present paper, we demonstrate that parallel-stranded DNA can also be formed in unconstrained bimolecular DNA of appropriate sequence homology. Three deoxyoligonucleotides, a 21-mer [dCCCATATATATTTTTTTTCCC], a ps-15-mer [dTATATATAAAAAAAA], and an aps-15-mer [dAAAAAAAATATATAT], have been synthesized. Annealing of 21-mer and aps-15-mer results in the formation of a conventional antiparallel duplex (aps); however, the combination of 21-mer and ps-15-mer forms a duplex in which the two strands are in a parallel orientation (ps). The parallel-stranded structure was established from the following criteria: (i) The parallel-stranded structure shows a 1:1 stoichiometry of the constituent strands. (ii) Gel electrophoretic mobility of the ps and aps duplexes are similar under native conditions. (iii) Spectroscopic properties of the ps duplex are characteristics for a base-paired structure but are different from the aps structure. (iv) Both duplexes undergo a thermally induced helix to coil transition; however, the melting temperature for the ps duplex is 22 degrees C lower. (v) The minor groove binding drug Hoechst 33258 shows a reduced affinity for the ps compared to the aps duplex. (vi) The parallel-stranded duplex is not a substrate for DNA Escherichia coli polymerase I (Klenow fragment) or AMV reverse transcriptase. Parallel-stranded DNA can exist under normal solution conditions, but competition experiments show it to be thermodynamically less favorable than the conventional antiparallel form.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M W Germann, B W Kalisch, J H van de Sande. 1988-11-01. Relative stability of parallel- and antiparallel-stranded duplex DNA.. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00422a002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sp1 is essential for p16 expression in human diploid fibroblasts during senescence.

BACKGROUND: p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor protein has been widely proposed to mediate entrance of the cells into the senescent stage. Promoter of p16(INK4a) gene contains at least five putative GC boxes, named GC-I to V, respectively. Our previous data showed that a potential Sp1 binding site, within the promoter region from -466 to -451, acts as a positive transcription regulatory element. These results led us to examine how Sp1 and/or Sp3 act on these GC boxes during aging in cultured human diploid fibroblasts. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mutagenesis studies revealed that GC-I, II and IV, especially GC-II, are essential for p16(INK4a) gene expression in senescent cells. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) and ChIP assays demonstrated that both Sp1 and Sp3 bind to these elements and the binding activity is enhanced in senescent cells. Ectopic overexpression of Sp1, but not Sp3, induced the transcription of p16(INK4a). Both Sp1 RNAi and Mithramycin, a DNA intercalating agent that interferes with Sp1 and Sp3 binding activities, reduced p16(INK4a) gene expression. In addition, the enhanced binding of Sp1 to p16(INK4a) promoter during cellular senescence appeared to be the result of increased Sp1 binding affinity, not an alteration in Sp1 protein level. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: All these results suggest that GC- II is the key site for Sp1 binding and increase of Sp1 binding activity rather than protein levels contributes to the induction of p16(INK4a) expression during cell aging.

Base Composition↗

Application of CE for determination of DNA base composition.

DNA base composition expressed as mol% of guanine plus cytosine (% GC) or GC content is a key parameter of bacterial taxonomy and genomic analyses. Direct chemical determination methods such as HPLC as well as indirect methods based on physical properties of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), melting point (T(m)), and buoyant density (B(d)) have been conventionally applied to determine the GC content. However, these methods require relatively large amounts of sample DNA, time, and labor. We have developed a protocol to determine the GC content by fine separation of nucleosides with CZE. Genomic DNAs with known GC content from 23 bacterial strains were determined by CE at the optimized conditions of 27 degrees C, 20 kV in 50 mM of NaHCO(3) (pH 9.0) and 70 mM SDS added. Nucleosides from <1 microg of DNA hydrolyzed with nuclease-P1 and bacterial alkaline phosphatase were separated in a 75 microm wide and 80 cm long silica capillary. The nucleoside peak areas were determined at 254 nm in less than 12 min. The CE-based determination of GC content requires only small amounts of DNA, and thus should be applicable to environmental genomics (metagenomics), as >90% of environmental micro-organisms are nonculturable and produce only small amounts of genomic DNA.

Base Composition↗