PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2489335

[Distortion of working models using different silicone impression techniques].

Abstract

The influences of differing strains levels of impression materials in compression and impression techniques on the distortion of working models were examined. The working models, which differed in the size of cervical spillway (2mm and 9mm) and the impression techniques applied (the two-phase technique and the wash technique), were produced by using putty-type impression materials with three different strain levels (Reprosil, Express and Exaflex) following the metal master model of mandibular denture in an abutment form. Distortion of the working models was then measured by a three-dimensional measuring system. The results were as follows. 1) The models produced through the impression technique using hard impression materials with low strain levels displayed decreases both in the degree of inclination to the X axis of the abutment tooth variations distance between the left and right abutment teeth. This procedure was found to yield a model which was proximate to the master model. 2) The impression technique incorporating a small cervical spillway resulted in decreases in variations in the distance between the right and left abutment teeth and the diameter of the molar part of the abutment tooth, and the horizontal distortion of the alveolar ridge; the model thus produced was found to be proximate to the master model. 3) Application of the two-phase technique reduced variations in height of the abutment tooth, and the use of the wash technique led to decreased variations in the distance between the right and left abutment teeth and diameter of the molar cervix of the abutment tooth. 4) Differences in strain levels of putty-type impression materials, the size of cervical spillway and the impression technique used did not influence deviation of the model toward the Y axis (vertical direction). 5) The models with least distortion of the abutment tooth were obtained by the two-phase technique using hard impression materials with lower strain levels or by the wash technique using soft materials with higher strain levels.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Yomaru, H Ohtake, S Yokozuka. 1989. [Distortion of working models using different silicone impression techniques].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2489335/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

How does it work?

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dental Impression Materials↗

[A new method of imprint receiving for non-removable dentures].

An original method of precision imprint receiving is described that provides high dimensional precision under maximal dynamic pressure on impression material and its penetration into gingival crevice. Comparison of the new method of imprint receiving with different traditional methods of impression making for non-removable dentures is made.

Dental Impression Materials↗

[Full arch impression techniques utilizing addition type poly vinyl siloxane for fabrication of tooth born fixed partial dentures].

A precise impression is necessary for fabricating an accurately fitting cast restoration. For this purpose, Polyvinyl Siloxane (PVS) impression materials are extremely popular because of their combination of excellent physical properties, handling characteristics and dimensional stability. Its excellent clinical features remain unaffected if simple measures are guarded. This review presents several impression techniques using PVS and recommends the one that provides the most accurate impression, utilizing the superior qualities of the PVS. The one step impression technique where no control of wash bulk and thickness exists, is considered to be the least accurate impression method with measured discrepancies as large as 7 times the original inter preparation distance and 40 times the original cross arch dimensions. Furthermore, the direct contact between the less refined putty material and the tooth preparation, as well as the high prevalence of air bubble entrapment, seriously compromises restoration longevity. The two stage impression technique has proved to produce the most accurate and reliable impressions due to complete control of the wash bulk and thickness entailed. The ideal wash bulk thickness should range between 1 to 2.5 mm all around the abutment tooth in order to minimize distortion of its subsequent die. Using a "Putty Tray" at the first stage with a predetermined space encircling the abutments will allow the wash to flow to its ideal uniform bulk size at the second stage. A uniform bulk size will prevent differential setting contraction and uneven changes at the dimensions of the die. The easiest and most clinically applicable method to achieve the desired space around the preparations is by loading the Putty material with the temporary crowns in place, followed by their removal at the second stage and occupation of the created space by the wash. In general, less control of wash bulk will result in either insufficient or excessive wash material which will determine uneven dimensional changes in the impression. This, in turn, will produce ill fitting cast restoration.

Dental Impression Materials↗