PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2512876

[Coronary bypass after thrombolysis].

Abstract

Owing to the development of transluminal angioplasty, coronary bypass surgery has now well-defined indications in patients who underwent thrombolysis. It may need to be performed in an emergency, but fortunately this only occurs in a few cases: in case of occlusion of the left main coronary vessel or equivalent lesions, when thrombolysis has failed and in case of failure of angioplasty with obliteration of large vessel and a still viable myocardium, and when the patient continues to suffer or shows signs of heart failure. The operative risk and the risk of haemorrhage then reach 10 p. 100. The installation, prior to surgery, of an intra-aortic counterpulsation system is useful in case of shock or left ventricular failure. Delayed coronary bypass is indicated mainly in case of three-vessel lesions with a less than 40 p. 100 ejection fraction, in case of stenosis of the left main coronary vessel or equivalent lesions, and in patients whose lesions are not amenable to angioplasty on a good caliber vessel, with a still viable myocardium. The operative risk in such cases is distinctly lower (2.4 p. 100). The long-term results obtained confirm the value of coronary bypass surgery when it becomes necessary after thrombolysis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Vacheron, X Tabone. 1989. [Coronary bypass after thrombolysis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2512876/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Invited commentary.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

Current trends in coronary artery disease in women.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are some striking sex differences regarding presentation, symptoms and sign, diagnosis, and treatment of coronary artery disease. Historically, healthcare delivery to women has been plagued with treatment bias favoring men. This review will present relevant cardiovascular physiologic sex differences, current treatment options for coronary artery disease both surgical and medical, and clinical outcomes of such treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past, pharmacologic and interventional studies generally excluded women from their subjects. As a result, women have been traditionally treated based on the findings in their male counterparts. Recent studies examining sex differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease have given new insight into the hormonal and behavioral influences associated with coronary artery disease. Finally, these studies have drawn attention to possibly inadvertent discrepancies in the way men and women are treated for coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: Despite significant advances in medical and surgical approaches to treat coronary artery disease, it remains and will continue to be the most important healthcare challenge of the 21st century. Whereas efforts are underway to encourage inclusion of more women in therapeutic trials, the educational process, particularly in medical school, needs to broadly address sex specific pathophysiology and treatment, rather than relying on sub-subspecialty training for optimizing healthcare delivery in women.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗