PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2514064

The Rh-negative donor.

Abstract

By typing fully for Rh, donor samples found to be D-negative but C-positive and/or E-positive on the Kontron Groupamatic G2000, the incidence of Ccddee (r'r) was found to be 0.44%, ccddEe (r"r) 0.50% and Du 0.30%. A total of 15,000 samples typed on the Groupamatic as D-, C- and E-negative were tested by an antiglobulin technique for Du, but none was found to be positive. A new strategy was therefore adopted for routine Rh typing of donations that includes typing first-time donors on the Groupamatic for C, D and E antigens; those that type as D-negative, C-positive and/or E-positive are further tested but no routine Du testing of D-, C- and E-negative donations is performed. Donations are labelled according to their D type, and the once used terminology 'Rh-positive donor, Rh-negative recipient' is no longer used except for those rare Rh D-positive donors belonging to the D category VI of Tippett & Sanger (1962).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Contreras, R C Knight. 1989. The Rh-negative donor.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2257.1989.tb00229.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Computer-based blood donor screening: a status report.

There is a substantial literature suggesting that computer-assisted interviewing has advantages over face-to-face and written self-administration of interviews in venues eliciting sensitive information similar to that sought in blood donor history screening. We review some of the recent developments in blood donor history screening, the evidence suggesting that automated interviews should be useful, and the experience to date using computer interviews for blood donation. These data suggest that automated computer-assisted interviewing increases the elicitation of behaviors associated with the risk of transfusion-transmissible infection in donors, improves donor and staff satisfaction, and reduces errors and omissions that frequently accompany traditional interviewing methods. Food and Drug Administration-cleared systems for computer-assisted self-interview of blood donors are briefly described.

Blood Banks↗

Emergency blood transfusion services after the 2005 earthquake in Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: On 8 October 2005, an earthquake measuring 7.6 on the Richter Scale struck the Himalayan region of Kashmir and Hazara divisions, killing an estimated 73,000 people. Soon after, a situation and response analysis of the emergency blood transfusion services was carried out in the affected areas to ascertain specific needs and suggest appropriate measures to assist in the disaster plan. METHOD: A semistructured questionnaire, complete with a checklist and participatory observation method, was used to collect data between 12 and 20 October 2005. Study sites were Abbotabad, Mansehra and Muzzafarabad in Pakistan, and interviewees were surgeons and blood bank personnel. RESULTS: Of the seven major hospitals in the area, 3 (43%) had a functional blood transfusion service. Although supply of voluntary blood was abundant, shortage of individual blood groups was noted at each centre. Quality assurance standards were either non-existent or inadequate. Only three blood banks had refrigerators, but with limited storage capacities. A complete breakdown of infrastructure coupled with frequent power failures posed a serious threat to safety of the blood. The continued aftershocks added to the problems. Although initial estimates of blood requirement were high, actual demand noted later was much lower. DISCUSSION: Timely establishment of blood banks in disaster areas, is a challenging task. Mobile blood banks can be advantageous in such situations. Organisation at a national level for blood transfusion services and development of a minimum standard of quality assurance in normal times should ensure safe emergency blood transfusion services when disaster strikes.

Blood Banks↗

Cord blood banking for potential future transplantation.

In recent years, umbilical cord blood, which contains a rich source of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, has been used successfully as an alternative allogeneic donor source to treat a variety of pediatric genetic, hematologic, immunologic, and oncologic disorders. Because there is diminished risk of graft-versus-host disease after transplantation of cord stem cells using matched related donors, the use of less-than-completely matched HLA cord blood stem cells may incur less risk of graft-versus-host disease than mismatched cells from either a related or unrelated "walking" donor, although this remains to be proven. Gene-therapy research involving modification of autologous cord blood stem cells for the treatment of childhood genetic disorders, although experimental at the present time, may prove to be of value. These scientific advances have resulted in the establishment of not-for-profit and for-profit cord blood-banking programs for allogeneic and autologous cord blood transplantation. Many issues confront institutions that wish to establish or participate in such programs. Parents often seek information from their physicians about this new biotechnology option. This document is intended to provide information to guide physicians in responding to parents' questions about cord blood donation and banking and the types and quality of cord blood banks. Provided also are recommendations about appropriate ethical and operational standards, including informed consent policies, financial disclosures, and conflict-of-interest policies for physicians, institutions, and organizations that operate or have a relationship with cord blood-banking programs.

Blood Banks↗