PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2518092

Non-A, non-B hepatitis.

Abstract

Diagnosis of non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANB) is made after exclusion of other known causes of hepatitis. Parenterally spread non-a, non-B hepatitis (PNANB) and enterally transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis (ENANB) almost certainly appear to be two different diseases. The definite causative agents have not hitherto been identified. Much of our knowledge of NANB is based on (i) experimental studies on chimpanzees; and (ii) epidemiological studies. Parenterally spread non-A non-B hepatitis caused by whole blood transfusion and blood-product infusion has different incubation periods and may be caused by different agents. It is a mild disease clinically, and the majority of the patients are asymptomatic. It can be prevented only by judicious use of blood transfusion. Whenever possible, blood/blood products should be derived from individual volunteer donors who are anti-HBc sero-negative and have serum alanine transaminase of under 45 IU/l. Enterally-transmitted non-A non-B hepatitis is endemic in the Indian subcontinent, South-East Asia, North and East Africa and Latin America. Epidemic NANB is usually transmitted by water supply contaminated with feces. ENANB has a predilection for young adults. The disease is usually mild, except in pregnant women, who have a high case-fatality rate from fulminant hepatic failure. Control measures include provision of clean water supplies, safe disposal of human excreta and sound personal and food hygiene practices.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A P Choksi, H G Desai. 1989. Non-A, non-B hepatitis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0753-3322(89)90163-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗