PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2527721

Delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to heparin.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Korstanje, P J Bessems, E Hardy, W J van de Staak. 1989. Delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction to heparin.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb03182.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Low dose subcutaneous adrenaline to prevent acute adverse reactions to antivenom serum in people bitten by snakes: randomised, placebo controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of low dose adrenaline injected subcutaneously to prevent acute adverse reactions to polyspecific antivenom serum in patients admitted to hospital after snake bite. DESIGN: Prospective, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: District general hospital in Sri Lanka. SUBJECTS: 105 patients with signs of envenomation after snake bite, randomised to receive either adrenaline (cases) or placebo (controls) immediately before infusion of antivenom serum. INTERVENTIONS: Adrenaline 0.25 ml (1:1000). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of acute adverse reactions to serum and side effects attributable to adrenaline. RESULTS: 56 patients (cases) received adrenaline and 49 (controls) received placebo as pretreatment. Six (11%) adrenaline patients and 21 (43%) control patients developed acute adverse reactions to antivenom serum (P=0.0002). Significant reductions in acute adverse reactions to serum were also seen in the adrenaline patients for each category of mild, moderate, and severe reactions. There were no significant adverse effects attributable to adrenaline. CONCLUSIONS: Use of 0.25 ml of 1:1000 adrenaline given subcutaneously immediately before administration of antivenom serum to patients with envenomation after snake bite reduces the incidence of acute adverse reactions to serum.

Administration, Cutaneous

[Acquired reactive perforating collagenosis in diabetes mellitus].

HISTORY AND ADMISSION FINDINGS: A 70-year-old woman with type 2B diabetes mellitus was referred to the dermatology department because of inflammatory skin changes of unknown origin over the trunk and limbs. On admission follicular and parafollicular livid-red papulae with central crusts and reddened margins were noted over the lower legs and the lumbosacral region. INVESTIGATIONS: Further physical examination revealed no additional abnormalities. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 41/79 mm. The day-time blood-glucose profile was raised (10.2, 12.6 and 8.6 mmol/l), as was the glycosylated haemoglobin HbA1c (9.0%). Swabs from fresh lesions gave no evidence of fungal or bacterial infection. Biopsies revealed areas of widened epidermis with central ulceration filled with fibrin, granulocytes and collagen fibres. DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND COURSE: The clinical and histological findings indicated an acquired reactive perforating collagenosis (dermatosis) which should be judged in relation to the long-standing diabetes mellitus. The cutaneous changes were covered with salicylate- and steroid-containing preparations, while individual lesions were excised or removed by curettage. CONCLUSION: The condition of acquired reactive perforating collagenosis is, like Kyrle's disease (perforating follicular and parafollicular hyperkeratotic dermatosis), perforating serpiginous elastosis and perforating folliculitis classified among the perforating dermatoses. In the presence of renal failure and (or) diabetes mellitus these dermatoses must be thought of in the differential diagnosis, in addition to the more frequent pruriginous conditions, if there are corresponding skin changes.

Administration, Cutaneous

A controlled trial of sustained-release bupropion, a nicotine patch, or both for smoking cessation.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Use of nicotine-replacement therapies and the antidepressant bupropion helps people stop smoking. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of sustained-release bupropion (244 subjects), a nicotine patch (244 subjects), bupropion and a nicotine patch (245 subjects), and placebo (160 subjects) for smoking cessation. Smokers with clinical depression were excluded. Treatment consisted of nine weeks of bupropion (150 mg a day for the first three days, and then 150 mg twice daily) or placebo, as well as eight weeks of nicotine-patch therapy (21 mg per day during weeks 2 through 7, 14 mg per day during week 8, and 7 mg per day during week 9) or placebo. The target day for quitting smoking was usually day 8. RESULTS: The abstinence rates at 12 months were 15.6 percent in the placebo group, as compared with 16.4 percent in the nicotine-patch group, 30.3 percent in the bupropion group (P<0.001), and 35.5 percent in the group given bupropion and the nicotine patch (P<0.001). By week 7, subjects in the placebo group had gained an average of 2.1 kg, as compared with a gain of 1.6 kg in the nicotine-patch group, a gain of 1.7 kg in the bupropion group, and a gain of 1.1 kg in the combined-treatment group (P<0.05). Weight gain at seven weeks was significantly less in the combined-treatment group than in the bupropion group and the placebo group (P<0.05 for both comparisons). A total of 311 subjects (34.8 percent) discontinued one or both medications. Seventy-nine subjects stopped treatment because of adverse events: 6 in the placebo group (3.8 percent), 16 in the nicotine-patch group (6.6 percent), 29 in the bupropion group (11.9 percent), and 28 in the combined-treatment group (11.4 percent). The most common adverse events were insomnia and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with sustained-release bupropion alone or in combination with a nicotine patch resulted in significantly higher long-term rates of smoking cessation than use of either the nicotine patch alone or placebo. Abstinence rates were higher with combination therapy than with bupropion alone, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Administration, Cutaneous