PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2591386

Nonpulmonary thoracic biopsy.

Abstract

The aim of the present paper is to distinguish between thoracic pulmonary needle biopsy--which can be carried out under fluoroscopic guidance--and thoracic extrapulmonary needle biopsy, which requires a more accurate type of guidance, such as CT. Among the 500 thoracic punctures performed during the last 5 years, we considered only 90 biopsies of mediastinal (N = 58) or thoracic wall (N = 32) masses. We have thus excluded all parenchymal lesions of the lungs. For extrapulmonary thoracic masses, CT was the method of choice for biopsy guidance which provided diagnostic evidence of small-diameter mediastinal lesions that permitted analysis of the relationship to vascular structures and performance of extrapleural needle insertion, using larger-gauge needles to ensure accurate needle placement within the lesion. In both mediastinal and thoracic wall lesions an overall accuracy rate of 84% was obtained. In no case was thoracic drainage required for treatment of the moderate degree of pneumothorax that occurred in 1% of our patient population.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Garbagnati, R Lutman, L Valvassori, A Marchianó, L Bellegotti. 1989. Nonpulmonary thoracic biopsy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2591386/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗