PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2634164

Constraints among molecular and systemic properties: implications for physiological genetics.

Abstract

Physiological genetics attempts to relate the molecular genetic properties of an organism--the genotype--to its integrated or physiological behavior--the phenotype. There has been relatively little progress in this field when compared to the neighboring fields of molecular and population genetics. This is due in part to the large number of highly non-linear interactions that characterize such systems. Biochemical Systems Theory is one approach that shows promise in dealing with the large number of non-linear interactions in a systematically structured manner. A variant of this approach has stressed the use of specific mathematical constraints, called summation and connectivity relationships, among molecular and systemic properties. In particular, the summation relationship has been used to argue that the predominance of recessive mutations is the inevitable consequence of the kinetic structure of enzyme networks and need not be attributed to natural selection. In order to put in broader perspective the implications of such constraints for physiological genetics, we have presented in this paper the outlines of the larger theory and the set of generalized steady state constraints that follow from first principles within this theory. The results show that the summation relationship suffers from a number of fundamental limitations that make it invalid for analyzing realistic biological systems. It also is shown that the more general constraint relationships, while valid, provide nothing new that cannot be obtained directly from the explicit solutions that are available within the larger theory. Thus, one can conclude that approaches based directly on the underlying equations of the system are superior to those based upon constraint relationships as a foundation for the development of physiological genetics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Savageau, A Sorribas. 1989-11-08. Constraints among molecular and systemic properties: implications for physiological genetics.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5193(89)80011-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of methods for analysis of selective genotyping survival data.

Survival traits and selective genotyping datasets are typically not normally distributed, thus common models used to identify QTL may not be statistically appropriate for their analysis. The objective of the present study was to compare models for identification of QTL associated with survival traits, in particular when combined with selective genotyping. Data were simulated to model the survival distribution of a population of chickens challenged with Marek disease virus. Cox proportional hazards (CPH), linear regression (LR), and Weibull models were compared for their appropriateness to analyze the data, ability to identify associations of marker alleles with survival, and estimation of effects when all individuals were genotyped (full genotyping) and when selective genotyping was used. Little difference in power was found between the CPH and the LR model for low censoring cases for both full and selective genotyping. The simulated data were not transformed to follow a Weibull distribution and, as a result, the Weibull model generally resulted in less power than the other two models and overestimated effects. Effect estimates from LR and CPH were unbiased when all individuals were genotyped, but overestimated when selective genotyping was used. Thus, LR is preferred for analyzing survival data when the amount of censoring is low because of ease of implementation and interpretation. Including phenotypic data of non-genotyped individuals in selective genotyping analysis increased power, but resulted in LR having an inflated false positive rate, and therefore the CPH model is preferred for this scenario, although transformation of the data may also make the Weibull model appropriate for this case. The results from the research presented herein are directly applicable to interval mapping analyses.

Genotype↗