Bone core biopsies. Plastic or paraffin?

Abstract

Plastic embedding of bone core biopsy specimens has been promoted as providing superior morphology, primarily because semi-thin sections can thereby be cut at 1-2 mu. The major disadvantages of plastic embedding are that it increases the technical load, is more expensive, and potentially has its own intrinsic problems, including difficulties in performing special stains and immunoperoxidase studies. In order to investigate the possibility that semi-thin paraffin sections may provide similar morphological results without the intrinsic disadvantages of plastic sections, we examined 45 bone core biopsy specimens that were sufficiently large to process one half in plastic and the other half in paraffin following decalcification. Both were cut at 1-2 mu. Although many plastic sections appear esthetically more pleasing, semi-thin paraffin sections of very high quality can also be obtained routinely. Additional advantages of paraffin sections were the ability to perform peroxidase studies, lower cost, less technologist time, and avoidance of problems occasionally arising with plastic, such as difficulties with impregnation or problems with polymerization. Peroxidase studies were particularly useful in patients with possible myeloma that was not overt on hematoxylin-and-eosin section and in confirming the presence or source of metastatic carcinoma. We therefore recommend the use of semi-thin (1-2 mu) paraffin sections for routine examination of bone core biopsy specimens.