PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2672452

How does protein folding get started?

R L Baldwin
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Three models for the initiation of protein folding are considered in the light of recent experiments. The three models emphasize the possible roles of: (1) a hydrophobic collapse, (2) formation of secondary structure, or (3) formation of one or more specific interactions. Whether these models are likely to be contradictory or complementary is discussed.

Explore related subjects

Protein ConformationJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.Review

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R L Baldwin. 1989. How does protein folding get started?. https://doi.org/10.1016/0968-0004(89)90067-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Depicting topology and handedness in jellyroll structures.

The jellyroll structure is a special case of the Greek key topology and, to date, has only been observed in complete form in one of its four possible arrangements. Like other elements of super-secondary structure involving the beta-strand (e.g. the beta alpha beta unit) the known structure forms a right-handed superhelix. The possibility of losing such tertiary information and other problems associated with representing these structures by two-dimensional topology diagrams are discussed. A series of rules are presented which allow this three-dimensional information to be represented in two-dimensional topology diagrams from which the handedness of a jellyroll structure can be determined.

Protein Conformation↗
PubMed1992

Concepts in protein folding.

Certain concepts and misconceptions in the field of protein folding are discussed from the viewpoint of a theoretical physicist. It is argued that there can be no protein folding code and that perceived correlations between sequence or composition and three-dimensional structure are more likely to be an artefact of a limited database than a real result. Attempts at using molecular dynamics algorithms are also likely to produce artefactual results because results depend critically on the unknown hamiltonian energy function. Correct calculations of configurational entropy are thought to be the most likely next step in understanding how and why proteins fold.

Protein Conformation↗
PubMed1992

Similarity between average distance maps of structurally homologous proteins.

A similarity between average distance maps (Kikuchi et al., 1988a)--that is, predicted contact maps of two tertiary structurally homologous proteins--is examined. Comparisons of shapes of average distance maps (we refer to this as ADM) are made by superpositions of ADMs for two homologous proteins. Also, we compare shapes of actual contact maps for the pair of proteins. We search a optimal superposition mode of each pair of maps showing that two proteins are most similar. It is concluded that two ADMs are also similar when actual tertiary structures between two proteins show similarity. A criterion for similarity of maps is also proposed. The possibility of application of this method to detect weak homology between protein structures is discussed.

Protein Conformation↗