PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2681586

Threshold limit values: historical perspectives and current practice.

Abstract

A 1989 Occupational Safety and Health Administration standard mandates that workplace air concentrations be held below new permissible exposure limits for 376 substances. As more than 350 of these limits came from the 1987 list of "Threshold Limit Values" (TLVs), the medical basis of the TLVs is of direct importance to the health of millions of workers. However, the TLV development process has been gravely flawed by lack of scientific rigor, inadequate medical input, and lack of attention to financial conflicts of interest. The adoption by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of many poorly supported values as permissible exposure limits reflects also the underutilization of industrial medicine in identifying health effects of exposures below the TLVs. It is thus the responsibility of the medical profession to act on the presumption that the TLV permissible exposure limits are unsafe limits until a sound underlying body of medical and scientific literature exists for the substances on the list. It is industry's responsibility to commit itself seriously to medical and exposure monitoring and to begin to remedy the knowledge deficit that exists about the less immediate health effects of most industrial materials.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G E Ziem, B I Castleman. 1989. Threshold limit values: historical perspectives and current practice.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-198911000-00014

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in air samples of meat smokehouses.

In a screening programme nine Danish meat smokehouses were randomly selected for measurements on concentration of airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). A total of 23 stationary air samples were collected during the entire working period of the kiln either above the kiln doors or approximately 2 m in front of the kiln doors (i.e. total exposure on the day of sampling). Three of these samples had a PAH content below the detection limit of the highly sensitive assay employed. Furthermore, eight personal air samples were collected during the periods of tending the kiln (i.e. peak exposure measurement). Three of these samples were below the detection limit. Total airborne PAH concentration of the stationary air samples calculated as the sum of the concentration of 16 selected PAH compounds, was in general far lower than the total airborne PAH concentration measured in the same manner in smokehouses curing fish (Nordholm et al., 1986). In contrast to the study on PAH exposure in smokehouses curing fish, the present study revealed no significant difference between total PAH content in air samples collected above the kilns compared with samples collected approximately 2 m in front of the kiln doors. Calculation of the relative content of the individual PAH compounds in the stationary air samples collected in meat smokehouses showed naphthalene to be the major compound in (70% +/- 26% of total PAH), whereas the relative content of carcinogenic PAH compounds in average represented 4.0% of the total PAH content. However, only approximately 15% of the stationary air samples with detectable content of total PAH contained detectable amounts of carcinogenic PAH compounds. Hence it was concluded that PAH exposure during cold meat curing might be considered a limited health hazard compared with PAH exposure during hot fish curing.

Air Pollutants, Occupational