PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2714112

Parallel processing data acquisition system for multilaser flow cytometry and cell sorting.

Abstract

This report describes the data acquisition electronics for a flow cytometer. The design differs from most instruments in that the signals from a large number of detectors are processed in parallel. Each of the input channels is capable of autonomously measuring and digitizing the fluorescence signals. The digitized values that belong to one particle are collected by digital circuitry and are presented as a compact data package on a special bus. In addition to the pulse values, the data package contains a time marker, information needed for sort decisions, and an error detection code. Specially designed electronic modules that read the information from the bus can take complex multiparameter sort decisions at a very high speed. All events can also be recorded as data lists by a computer. The lists can be used to reconstruct a sort or analysis run. The raw data lists can also be reduced to kinetic curves and/or (gated) multivariate histograms. As a result of the applied scheme of parallel pulse processing, the dead time of the system is independent of the number of parameters measured and the number and time separation of the excitation beams. The instrument has a cycle time of 5 microseconds, which corresponds to a throughput rate of 2 x 10(5) events/s. At this rate, the incidence of correlation errors is well below 1 in 10(8) analyzed particles. The system has proved to be reliable and convenient to use in a variety of experiments. Its high speed and low error rate make it well suited for high-resolution measurements, rare-event analysis, kinetic measurements, and high-speed cell sorting.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G van den Engh, W Stokdijk. 1989. Parallel processing data acquisition system for multilaser flow cytometry and cell sorting.. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990100307

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Integration of a barcode reader with a commercial flow cytometer.

This report describes the application and installation of a barcode reader on a standard EPICS Elite flow cytometer. The barcode reader system eliminates keyboard entry of sample information on the cytometer. The system automates the transfer of sample information already present in our laboratory database to the cytometer at run time. The system uses a standard "off-the-shelf" bar code wand with a personal computer keyboard interface and requires no additional software at run time. No typing of sample information is required by the operator at any stage of normal sample operation at the cytometer. All operations are automatically coded into the cytometry software using the macro functions of the software. Tubes are inserted into the tube reader and sample information is transferred automatically into the cytometer. We have found that the system allows rapid and continuous operation of routine clinical and research samples. This automated data entry also reduces the possibility of data input errors.

Electronic Data Processing

Comparison of lymphocyte immunophenotypes obtained simultaneously from two different data acquisition and analysis systems on the same flow cytometer.

Immunophenotyping of different lymphocyte populations was carried out in parallel on 113 consecutively received specimens of human peripheral blood using 2 different data acquisition and analysis systems (EPICS C and 4Cyte-Acmecyte) on the same flow cytometer (EPICS C). The phenotypes analyzed were CD3+, CD4+, CD8+ CD56+ CD16+ CD3-, TCR-gamma delta+ CD8-, and TCR-gamma delta+ CD8+. Both HIV- and HIV+ specimens were used for this study, including some with CD4 levels as low as 2% of all lymphocytes. Despite differences in gating procedures and shapes of bitmap (rectilinear vs. "amorphous"), the 2 methods agreed to within 2% positive cells in 97% of the cases. Although some statistically significant biases in the methods were observed, these were small and not biologically important. We conclude that both methods of data acquisition and analysis, as employed by experienced operators on the EPICS C flow cytometer, gave essentially equivalent results for lymphocyte sub-populations in peripheral blood preparations.

Electronic Data Processing