PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2747483

Implementing change in medical education in developing countries.

Abstract

Medical schools in developing countries are constantly faced with the problem of adapting an inherited style of education to suit local needs and constraints. Often these needs have changed considerably since the curriculum was first established. Yet the difficulty of bringing about curricular changes, especially in conventional medical schools, is well known. This paper attempts to guide innovators in developing countries, but many of the suggestions are appropriate to all innovators. The issue of international standards is closely scrutinised, and their hypothetical nature revealed. The detrimental effect of national licensing examinations on curricular innovation is discussed. The futility of ad hoc changes and the need for a carefully thought out philosophy of change which leads logically to new ways of educating future professionals are stressed. Guidelines for maintaining an innovation and for evaluating its short- and long-term outcomes are developed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R C Bandaranayake. 1989. Implementing change in medical education in developing countries.. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421598909146274

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Communicative and strategic action in interpreted consultations in primary health care: a Habermasian perspective.

We report a qualitative study of accounts of interpreted consultations in UK primary care. The study sought to explore how three Habermasian tensions between (a) system and lifeworld, (b) communicative and strategic action, and (c) interpersonal and macropolitical spheres played out in the triadic consultation between clinician, interpreter and patient. In a total of 69 individual interviews and two focus groups, we collected narratives from service users (through interpreters or bilingual researchers), interpreters and doctors and other staff in general practice. We recorded, transcribed and analysed these, taking the story as the main unit of analysis. Our data suggest that the preconditions for communicative action are rarely met in the interpreted consultation. The interpreter's presence makes a dyadic interaction into a triad, adding considerable complexity to the social situation and generating operational and technical challenges. Lack of trust, intense pressure of time, mismatch of agendas (biomedical versus lifeworld), firm expectations of a specific outcome (e.g. referral, prescription) and profound power imbalances all promote strategic action (i.e. speech that seeks consciously or unconsciously to manipulate an outcome) rather than communicative action (i.e. sincere efforts to achieve understanding, and reach consensus) by all parties. In consultations interpreted by family members (an option traditionally seen as 'second best' by policy makers), the social situation is very different. Family members are generally trusted, share the lifeworld agenda, and shift the power balance in the patient's favour. The interpreter occupies multiple social roles, including translator, interpersonal mediator, system mediator, educator, advocate, and link worker. The essence of professionalism in interpreting is shifting judiciously between these potentially conflicting roles. We discuss the implications of our findings for communication with limited English speakers in healthcare consultations and for realizing contemporary policy goals such as concordance, shared decision-making, empowerment, and choice.

Communication Barriers↗