PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2757862

Initial experience with a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator.

Abstract

Intramyocardial current flow is a critical factor in successful ventricular defibrillation. The main determinants of intramyocardial current flow during transthoracic countershock are the selected energy and the transthoracic impedance of the patient. To optimise the success of the first shock and to titrate energy dosage according to each patient's transthoracic impedance, a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator was developed. It was compared with a conventional energy based protocol of 200 J (delivered energy), 200 J, then 360 J if required in 42 consecutive episodes of ventricular fibrillation in 33 men and seven women. The mean (SD) predicted transthoracic impedance was 69.9 (14.0) omega. First shock success with the standard protocol was 80.9%, and first or second shock success was 95.2%. The microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator automatically measured transthoracic impedance and calculated the energy required to develop a selected current in each patient. A current protocol of 30 A, 30 A, then 40 A, if required, was used in 29 men and 12 women with 41 episodes of ventricular fibrillation. Transthoracic impedance (mean 65.1 (15.9) omega) was similar to that in the energy protocol group and success rates for first shock (82.9%) and first or second shocks (97.5%) were also similar. The mean delivered energy per shock with the current based defibrillator for first or second shock success was significantly less (144.8 J) with the energy protocol (200 J). The mean peak current of successful shocks was also significantly reduced (29.0 v 31.9 A). A current based defibrillator titrates energy according to transthoracic impedance; it has a success rate comparable to conventional defibrillators but it delivers significantly less energy and current per shock.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G W Dalzell, S R Cunningham, J Anderson, A A Adgey. 1989. Initial experience with a microprocessor controlled current based defibrillator.. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.61.6.502

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An advanced signal processing technique for impedance cardiography.

A new design using the latest technique in signal processing, the time-frequency analysis method, was developed to process impedance cardiography signals. This technique, when used to determine the relevant calculation parameters, was found to be more accurate than conventional methods. It was shown to be advantageous in reducing ventilation artifacts and motion noise, resulting in greater accuracy. Its cardiac output values had a much better correlation coefficient when compared in the clinical setting to the standard thermodilution technique than did the values from conventional impedance cardiography devices.

Cardiography, Impedance

Examination of impedance cardiography properties--FEM model studies.

A FEM has been used to examine influence of tissues' conductivities and electrodes' array configurations on the results obtained by Impedance Cardiography. A Geselowitz's relationship has been applied to estimate partial contributions from each region of thorax. The obtained results have indicated the strong dependence of ICG signal on factors mentioned above. It seems that additional measurements and more advanced ICG waveform processing must be done to minimise errors in estimating parameters of mechanical work of heart by means of ICG.

Cardiography, Impedance