PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2760355

The glycemic index: variation between subjects and predictive difference.

Abstract

It is not known whether the variability of the glycemic index (GI) in different subjects is due to within- or between-individual variation. In addition, it is not known how large a difference in GI between different meals is clinically important for individuals with diabetes. Therefore, insulin-dependent (IDDM) and non-insulin-dependent (NIDDM) diabetic subjects tested four foods, with each food taken by each subject on two separate occasions. For each food, most of the variation of absolute glycemic responses was due to differences between the subjects. However, when the results were expressed as the GI, there were no significant differences between the subjects, and most of the variation was due to within-individual variation. Using the within-individual variance, we estimated the so-called "predictive difference" of GI values. Its reliability was assessed by consideration of published data from eight studies where different mixed meals were taken by the same group of subjects. There were 37 cases where the difference between the GI of any two meals was greater than the predictive difference. Of these 37 pairs of meals, the GI correctly ranked the glycemic responses in 36 (97%). We conclude that GI values for the same food do not vary significantly between different individuals. For a subject with NIDDM a difference in GI of 34 will predict the ranking of glycemic responses of two meals with 95% probability. The corresponding value for a subject with IDDM is 50.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T M Wolever, A Csima, D J Jenkins, G S Wong, R G Josse. 1989. The glycemic index: variation between subjects and predictive difference.. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.1989.10720298

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Intensive insulin therapy in critical care: a review of 12 protocols.

OBJECTIVE: To review performance characteristics of 12 insulin infusion protocols. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We systematically identify and compare 12 protocols and then apply the protocols to generate insulin recommendations in the management of a patient with hyperglycemia. The main focus involves a comparison of insulin doses and patterns of insulin administration. RESULTS: There is great variability in protocols. Areas of variation include differences in initiation and titration of insulin, use of bolus dosing, requirements for calculation in adjustment of the insulin infusion, and method of insulin protocol adjustments. Insulin recommendations for a sample patient are calculated to highlight differences between protocols, including the patterns and ranges of insulin dose recommended (range 27-115 units [mean +/- SD 66.7 +/- 27.9]), amount recommended for glucose readings >200 mg/dl, and adjustments nearing target glucose. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of consensus in the delivery of intravenous insulin infusions is reflected in the wide variability of practice noted in this survey. This mandates close attention to the choice of a protocol. One protocol may not suffice for all patients.

Blood Glucose↗

Metabolic improvement of male prisoners with type 2 diabetes in Fukushima Prison, Japan.

Imprisonment often improves metabolic control in prisoners with type 2 diabetes; however, the reasons for this remain unclear. Here, we investigated the metabolic control of male prisoners with type 2 diabetes in Japan. Retrospective analysis of 4385 medical charts of male prisoners in Fukushima Prison from 1998 to 2004 revealed 109 prisoners (all Asian) with type 2 diabetes (mean+/-S.D.: 51+/-10 years). All were followed up during their imprisonment (14+/-10 months). During imprisonment, mean fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin Alc (HbA1c) levels dramatically decreased from 184+/-74 to 113+/-38mg/dl (p<0.001) and 8.4+/-2.1 to 5.9+/-1.2% (p<0.001), respectively. In addition, 5 of 18 prisoners (28%) treated with insulin and 17 of 34 (50%) treated with oral hypoglycemic agents were able to discontinue their treatment and maintain good metabolic control. Most prisoners in Japanese prisons work 8h a day 5 days a week, consuming a high dietary fiber diet including boiled rice with barley, "Mugimeshi". These findings suggest that a well-regulated lifestyle and long-term intake of high dietary fiber may have beneficial effects on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Blood Glucose↗

Reduction in midthigh low-density muscle with aerobic exercise training and weight loss impacts glucose tolerance in older men.

CONTEXT: Intramuscular lipid content increases with aging and obesity and is directly related to impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the effects of aerobic exercise training (AEX) with and without weight loss (WL) on midthigh low-density muscle (LDM; a measure of im lipid) and whether changes in LDM impact glucose tolerance in sedentary older men. DESIGN: Forty-six men (60.4 +/- 1.1 yr) completed 6 months of AEX (n = 34) or AEX + WL (n = 12) and had oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) and computed tomography measures of LDM and regional abdominal and thigh fat depot areas. RESULTS: At baseline, LDM area directly correlated with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 120-min glucose (G(120)), and glucose area under the curve (G(AUC)) during an OGTT (r = 0.44, r = 0.51, and r = 0.54, respectively, P < 0.01). After the interventions, the AEX + WL group had greater decreases in LDM (-13.5 vs. +1.3%, respectively), FPG (-8.3 vs. +2.1%, respectively), G(120) (-22.5 vs. -3.6%, respectively), and G(AUC) (-17.3 vs. - 3.1%, respectively) than the AEX group. In the entire sample, the decreases in LDM correlated with reductions in FPG, G(120), and G(AUC) during an OGTT (r = 0.31, r = 0.34, and r = 0.41, P < 0.05). Changes in other regional fat depots did not independently correlate with glucose tolerance or insulin responses. CONCLUSION: AEX + WL is more efficacious than AEX for reducing LDM and glucose tolerance. The improvement in glucose tolerance may be partially mediated by decreases in LDM in older men.

Blood Glucose↗