PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2764798

Three-dimensional radiation treatment planning.

Abstract

A major aim of radiation therapy is to deliver sufficient dose to the tumour volume to kill the cancer cells while sparing the nearby healthy organs to prevent complications. With the introduction of devices such as CT and MR scanners, radiation therapy treatment planners have access to full three-dimensional anatomical information to define, simulate, and evaluate treatments. There are a limited number of prototype software systems that allow 3D treatment planning currently in use. In addition, there are more advanced tools under development or still in the planning stages. They require sophisticated graphics and computation equipment, complex physical and mathematical algorithms, and new radiation treatment machines that deliver dose very precisely under computer control. Components of these systems include programs for the identification and delineation of the anatomy and tumour, the definition of radiation beams, the calculation of dose distribution patterns, the display of dose on 2D images and as three dimensional surfaces, and the generation of computer images to verify proper patient positioning in treatment. Some of these functions can be performed more quickly and accurately if artificial intelligence or expert systems techniques are employed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Mohan. 1989. Three-dimensional radiation treatment planning.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2764798/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Examination of dose verification in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning using averaging dose in chamber volume].

Since the year 2000, our hospital has been equipped with an intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) facility. Before IMRT is administered, the absorbed dose is measured by the ionization chamber to provide verification for the IMRT procedure. In utilizing the current point dose evaluation, large discrepancies have been experienced when the measured dose is compared with the calculated dose. This discrepancy is due to the lack of uniformity in IMRT irradiation in comparison with that of the present method of dose distribution. In order to reduce the margin of error, the average dose of the ionization chamber calculated on a dose-volume histogram was compared with the measured dose. As a result, the margin of error was minimized to <2% in uniform areas and <4% in non-uniform areas.

Radiotherapy Dosage↗

Independent dose calculations for the corvus MLC IMRT.

Two independent dose calculation methods have been explored to validate MLC-based IMRT plans from the NOMOS CORVUS system. After the plan is generated on the CORVUS planning system, the beam parameters are imported into an independent workstation. The beam parameters consist of intensity maps at each gantry angle. In addition, CT scans of the patient are imported into the independent workstation to obtain the external contour of the patient. The coordinate system is defined relative to the alignment point chosen in the CORVUS plan. The 2 independent calculation methods are based on a pencil beam kernel convolution and a Clarkson-type differential scatter summation, respectively. The pencil beam data for a 1 x 1-cm beam, as formed by the multileaf collimator, were measured for the 6-MV photon beam from a Siemens PRIMUS linear accelerator using film dosimetry. In the pencil beam method, the dose at a point is calculated using the depth and off-axis distance from a given pencil beam, corrected for beam intensity. The scatter summation method used the conversion of measured depth dose data into scatter maximum ratios. In this method, the differential scatter from each pencil beam is corrected for the beam intensity. Isodose distributions were generated using the independent dose calculations and compared to the CORVUS plans. Although isodose distributions from both methods show good agreement with the CORVUS plan, our implementation of the differential scatter summation approach seems more favorable. The 2 independent dose calculation algorithms are described in this paper.

Radiotherapy Dosage↗