A comparison of two microcomputer-based programs for bibliographic retrieval and formatting.

Abstract

We evaluated two representative microcomputer-based programs for organizing a biomedical literature filing system. With a bibliography of 100 anesthetic references, a series of benchmark tests was developed to measure the speed and accuracy of typical searching, sorting, and formatting tasks. Each program performed the searching tasks accurately and at about the same speed. One program performed sorting without errors, provided the field order of the template used to enter references was unchanged. Both programs used "punctuation files," that is, templates for controlling author presentation; punctuation to suit style requirements of individual journals; and order of particular fields, such as publisher and year of publication. Each program was able to format journal, book, and chapter references correctly, but the resulting output required some refining in a word processor. Both require a major time commitment to learn and to create custom punctuation files for journals not included in the predesigned punctuation files. Once mastered, both programs are quite competent at organizing reprints and formatting journal references.