PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2772557

Reference methods--with special reference to cholesterol.

Abstract

Through the work of the committee for reference methods in NORDKEM and the Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry, a hierarchy of methods was established in Denmark in 1982 for accuracy assurance of determination of total cholesterol in serum. The hierarchy makes it possible for any laboratory to relate their results of measurements on fresh samples from humans, to the results obtained on the same samples by reference methods, which have been adjusted to definitive methodology. Proficiency studies in 1985 and 1988 gave consensus values (mean of all participants data) for total cholesterol in frozen human serum almost identical to values obtained by reference methods. Interlaboratory coefficients of variations were 4-5%. It is essential for the clinical chemist as well as for the clinician to be aware of the relative quantitative importance of preanalytical, analytical and biological variation and to realize to what extent replicate measurements on the same sample and on several samples from the same person reduce the total intraperson variation of serum cholesterol concentrations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Stender. 1989. Reference methods--with special reference to cholesterol.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2772557/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Duplication in a medical department of tests previously performed in a primary sector].

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether an insufficient flow of information from the primary to the secondary sector was the cause of unnecessary duplications of investigations. From practitioners of 202 patients admitted to a medical department information about paraclinical examinations during the previous year was obtained. In all 111 general practitioners participated. An average of 3.0 blood analyses and 0.9 other investigations were carried out on each patient. 44% of the patients were not investigated at all. An average of 1.9 blood analyses and 0.2 other investigations on each patient were repeated. 22% of the repetitions in both cases were due to insufficient communication between the practitioner and the hospital. These figures seem low and insufficient communication between the primary and the secondary sector appears to be a minor problem.

Blood Chemical Analysis