Scaphoid anatomy: evaluation with complex motion tomography.

D K Smith; R L Linscheid; P C Amadio; T H Berquist; W P Cooney

doi:10.1148/radiology.173.1.2781005

Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2781005

Scaphoid anatomy: evaluation with complex motion tomography.

D K Smith·R L Linscheid·P C Amadio·T H Berquist·W P Cooney

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Complex motion tomography was used to study the normal orientation of the axes of the proximal and distal scaphoid poles as a basis for comparison with displaced or malunited scaphoid fractures. Biplanar tomograms of 10 normal wrists were evaluated by seven physicians with the use of two standardized measurement techniques. The reference planes used for the first technique were the volar cortical surface of the proximal scaphoid and the dorsal cortical surface of the distal scaphoid. The apparent angulation between the reference planes with this technique averaged 32 degrees +/- 5 degrees on the sagittal view and 40 degrees +/- 3 degrees on the coronal view. The second technique used the orientation of the proximal articular surface relative to the distal articular surface of the scaphoid. The angulation between the axes averaged 24 degrees +/- 5 degrees in the sagittal plane and 40 degrees +/- 4 degrees in the coronal plane.

Explore related subjects

Carpal Bones Humans Movement Tomography, X-Ray Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

D K Smith, R L Linscheid, P C Amadio, T H Berquist, W P Cooney. 1989. Scaphoid anatomy: evaluation with complex motion tomography.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.173.1.2781005

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Carpal anomalies.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Carpal Bones↗

PubMed2006

Diagnostic strategy for suspected scaphoid fractures in the presence of other fractures in the carpal region.

Bone scintigraphy will identify up to 25% of occult scaphoid bone fractures after negative scaphoid X-rays. Consequently, it deserves a place in the diagnostic process of suspected scaphoid fractures. However, the role of bone scintigraphy is less clear if scaphoid X-rays show other fractures in the carpal region. We analysed 111 consecutive patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture on physical examination. Scaphoid X-rays revealed 61 fractures. Fifty-five patients had scaphoid fractures only and six patients had other fractures in the carpal region but no scaphoid fracture. In 50 cases, no bone injury was seen on these X-rays. In three out of the six patients with other fractures in the carpal region, bone scintigraphy revealed four occult concomitant fractures: one scaphoid, one scaphoid and trapezial and one capitate fracture. In conclusion, bone scintigraphy is required when scaphoid X-rays do not confirm a suspected scaphoid fracture, even in the presence of other fractures in the carpal region.

Carpal Bones↗

PubMed2006

Intra-individual comparison between open and 2-portal endoscopic release in clinically matched bilateral carpal syndrome.

Based upon bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) we undertook a prospective randomised intra-individual comparison between open (OR) and 2-portal endoscopic release (2-PER) to establish if there is any demonstrable advantage in undertaking either technique in a 1 year follow-up. Ten patients with bilateral CTS were enrolled in this study and underwent a 2-PER on the one and an OR with two minimised incisions on the contralateral hand. Both hands were examined pre- and postoperatively after 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks and after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Preoperatively both hands revealed statistically no significant differences in all the parameters recorded. Comparing both techniques no significant differences could be detected in the follow-up period. Nevertheless, both techniques showed significant improvements in the severity of symptoms and pain, in sensory nerve testing and in electro-diagnostic parameters, when comparing pre- with postoperative data after 1 year. The endoscopic approach revealed no distinct advantages over the open technique not only in the late but also in the early postoperative follow-up period when performing intra-individual comparison. Considering the higher complication rate and costs when performing 2-PER the OR with two minimised incisions seems to be a good alternative in order to keep the recovery period as short as possible.

Carpal Bones↗