PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2781659

[Thorotrast].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Wilson. 1989-07-24. [Thorotrast].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2781659/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Type, severity, frequency and management of adverse reactions associated with ultrasound contrast agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis are aimed at evaluating the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following administration of clinically approved ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in adults and children, to assess risks in patients with cardiovascular disease and in pregnancy, and to evaluate the effectiveness of emergency management of severe ADRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PRISMA 2020 systematic review was conducted searching PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality. Incidence estimates were pooled when feasible, stratified by age group, contrast agent, and administration route. RESULTS: Seventy-four studies encompassing >&#x2009;1 million adults and >&#x2009;36,000 children were included, contributing multiple analytic cohorts to the quantitative synthesis. Severe acute ADRs were extremely rare (6 and 16 cases per 100,000 in adults and children, respectively) and absent following endocavitary administration in children. Non-severe acute ADRs occurred in 11 and 8 cases per 10,000 adults and children, respectively. Delayed reactions were very rare (<&#x2009;1 case per million in adults). No significant safety differences emerged between UCA products. The incidence of ADRs in patients with cardiovascular disease was analogous to the general population. No ADRs were reported in pregnant women. Standard emergency management was effective in almost all serious cases, though rare fatalities occurred. CONCLUSION: UCAs show an excellent safety profile in adults and children, with very rare severe ADRs and few non-severe, typically self-limiting reactions. Strict adherence to recommended emergency management protocols mitigates the remaining risks, supporting safe use across a broad range of clinical indications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023432668. KEY POINTS: Question What is the incidence, type, and severity of acute and delayed ADRs associated with clinically approved UCAs across different patient populations? Findings Severe acute adverse reactions are very rare, and non-severe reactions are rare and self-limiting, with no significant safety differences between adults, children, or patients with cardiovascular disease. Clinical relevant UCAs show an excellent safety profile across populations. These findings support their safe clinical use as reliable alternatives to iodine-based and gadolinium-based contrast agents in routine diagnostic imaging.

Contrast Media↗

The effect of ligand scaffold size on the stability of tripodal hydroxypyridonate gadolinium complexes.

The variation of the size of the capping scaffold which connects the hydroxypyridonate (HOPO) binding units in a series of tripodal chelators for gadolinium (Gd) complexes has been investigated. A new analogue of TREN-1-Me-3,2-HOPO (1) (TREN = tri(ethylamine)amine) was synthesized: TREN-Gly-1-Me-3,2-HOPO (2) features a glycine spacer between the TREN cap and HOPO binding unit. TRPN-1-Me-3,2-HOPO (3) has a propylene-bridged cap, as compared to the ethylene bridges within the TREN cap of the parent complex. Thermodynamic equilibrium constants for the acid-base properties of 2 and the Gd(3+) complexation strength of 2 and 3 were measured and are compared with that of the parent ligand. The most basic ligand is 2 while 3 is the most acidic. Both 2 and 3 form Gd(3+) complexes of similar stability (pGd = 16.7 and 15.6, respectively) and are less stable than the parent complex Gd-1 (pGd = 19.2). Two of the three complexes are more stable than the bis(methylamide)diethylenetriamine pentaacetate complex Gd(DTPA-BMA) (pGd = 15.7) while the other is of comparable stability. Enlargement of the ligand scaffold decreases the stability of the Gd(3+) complexes and indicates that the TREN scaffold is superior to the TRPN and TREN-Gly scaffolds. The proton relaxivity of Gd-2 is 6.6 mM(-)(1) s(-)(1) (20 MHz, 25 degrees C, pH 7.3), somewhat lower than the parent Gd-1 but higher than that of the MRI contrast agents in clinical practice. The pH-independent relaxivity of Gd-2 is uncharacteristic of this family of complexes and is discussed.

Contrast Media↗

Coronary artery bypass graft patency: assessment with true ast imaging with steady-state precession versus gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of multisection true fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography for the detection of coronary artery bypass graft patency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with coronary artery bypass grafts who had recently undergone conventional coronary angiography underwent MR angiography with a 1.5-T system. True FISP angiographic images were acquired in transverse and coronal planes. Coronal cardiac-gated MR angiography was performed with 0.2 mL per kilogram of body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine injected at a rate of 2 mL/sec. With conventional angiography as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each technique for the detection of graft patency were determined. Image quality and duration of analysis were determined by two experienced radiologists. RESULTS: In 25 patients, 46 of 56 venous grafts were patent and 22 of 23 arterial grafts were patent. In all grafts at true FISP angiography, sensitivity for patency was 84% (57 of 68 grafts), specificity was 45% (five of 11 grafts), and accuracy was 78% (62 of 79 grafts). At MR angiography, sensitivity was 85% (58 of 68 grafts), specificity was 73% (eight of 11 grafts), and accuracy was 84% (66 of 79 grafts) (difference not significant). Image quality scores were similar with both techniques, but duration of analysis was significantly longer with MR angiography than with true FISP angiography (29 minutes 24 seconds vs 14 minutes 6 seconds, P <.001). CONCLUSION: Accuracy for detection of coronary artery bypass graft patency was similar with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and true FISP angiography, with a trend toward more false-positive findings for occlusion and reduced visualization of arterial grafts with true FISP angiography.

Contrast Media↗