PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2788982

Constrictive pericarditis after cardiac surgery.

Abstract

Forty-five patients were identified as having constrictive pericarditis after cardiac surgery. The mean patient age was 61 years (range, 40 to 77 years). Twenty-three of 37 patients with adequate clinical information were reported to have had a diagnosis of postpericardiotomy syndrome after the original surgery. The mean interval from original surgery to presentation with constriction was 23.4 months (range, 1 to 204 months). Computerized tomography was helpful in establishing a diagnosis of constriction in 23 of 29 patients (79%). Bypass graft patency was 93% (85 of 91 grafts). Severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery systolic pressure greater than or equal to 60 mm Hg) was present in nine patients; 8 had coexistent valvular disease (seven cases of mitral valve disease, and aortic valve disease in one). Thirty-seven of the 45 patients underwent pericardial stripping, 28 of whom experienced marked symptomatic improvement. One patient had persistent right heart failure, which was not documented to be secondary to constriction. Four patients had persistent constrictive physiologic conditions. Three of these patients had more extensive pericardial stripping and showed clinical improvement. Four patients (11%) died within 30 days of stripping. Eight patients received medical therapy alone. The decision to treat patients medically was based either on favorable response to medical therapy (five patients), or poor general clinical status.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D M Killian, J G Furiasse, P J Scanlon, H S Loeb, H J Sullivan. 1989. Constrictive pericarditis after cardiac surgery.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(89)90273-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Invited commentary.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

Current trends in coronary artery disease in women.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are some striking sex differences regarding presentation, symptoms and sign, diagnosis, and treatment of coronary artery disease. Historically, healthcare delivery to women has been plagued with treatment bias favoring men. This review will present relevant cardiovascular physiologic sex differences, current treatment options for coronary artery disease both surgical and medical, and clinical outcomes of such treatments. RECENT FINDINGS: In the past, pharmacologic and interventional studies generally excluded women from their subjects. As a result, women have been traditionally treated based on the findings in their male counterparts. Recent studies examining sex differences in the treatment of coronary artery disease have given new insight into the hormonal and behavioral influences associated with coronary artery disease. Finally, these studies have drawn attention to possibly inadvertent discrepancies in the way men and women are treated for coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: Despite significant advances in medical and surgical approaches to treat coronary artery disease, it remains and will continue to be the most important healthcare challenge of the 21st century. Whereas efforts are underway to encourage inclusion of more women in therapeutic trials, the educational process, particularly in medical school, needs to broadly address sex specific pathophysiology and treatment, rather than relying on sub-subspecialty training for optimizing healthcare delivery in women.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗