PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 2800351

Cortical processing of hyperacuity tasks.

M A Paradiso·T Carney·R D Freeman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Spatial discrimination thresholds were determined by having subjects make comparisons between stimuli presented successively at the same or at different locations in the visual field. Two tasks were employed, discrimination of line orientation and discrimination of the distance between two parallel lines (spatial interval discrimination). We find that discrimination thresholds based on the comparison of features in spatially-separated stimuli are comparable to those based on the comparison of features in two stimuli presented successively at the same location. This holds even when the stimuli are presented in nonhomologous positions in the visual field or are presented in a manner such that they activate cells in opposite cortical hemispheres in the early visual areas. This shows that discriminability is not determined solely by differences in the firing rates of striate or pre-striate neurons. Rather, it appears that the attributes of visual stimuli are precisely coded and available for comparison at higher levels of visual processing. Implications of this finding for models of hyperacuity are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Discrimination, PsychologicalHumansMalePattern Recognition, VisualRotationSensory ThresholdsVisual AcuityVisual CortexVisual FieldsJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Paradiso, T Carney, R D Freeman. 1989. Cortical processing of hyperacuity tasks.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(89)90128-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

Human tactile discrimination of curvature when contact area with the skin remains constant.

A forced choice paradigm was used to measure the capacity of human subjects to discriminate the curvature of stimuli applied passively to the skin of an immobilized finger. The stimuli consisted of spherically curved segments with a base radius of 2.5 mm; thus the area of contact with the fingerpad skin was approximately 19.6 mm2 for all stimuli. There were 2 series of experiments. In series 1, the standard surface had a curvature of 286 m-1 (radius of curvature 3.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 13%. In series 2, the standard had a curvature of 154 m-1 (radius 6.5 mm); subjects were able to discriminate an increase in curvature of about 18%. Thus, even when the contact area between the surface and the skin was invariant, humans were able to discriminate small changes in curvature using only information from the cutaneous receptors.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1992

Segregation of mesh-derived textures evaluated by resistance to added disorder.

In the "figure detection task" the strength of segregation for a particular texture pair was estimated by the threshold amount of added disorder that prevented segregation of a textured figure from a textured ground. Disorder was either jitter in the orientation of the texture elements, or jitter in their xy positions, or a mixture of the two. Other procedures included lowpass filtering, and a task requiring discrimination between textured figures of different shapes. Orientation cues are weakly or inconsistently used for segregating mesh textures. The low spatial harmonics are very important. A new finding is that orientation and position jitter thresholds for a set of figure/ground texture patterns are often proportional. In a mixture the one disorder can be exchanged for the other.

Discrimination, Psychological↗