PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2806926

Specular and scanning electron microscopy in diffuse silicone keratopathy.

Abstract

In a 50-year-old man, penetrating keratoplasty was carried out to treat a diffuse silicone keratopathy that developed 2 years after a pars plana vitrectomy combined with an intravitreal silicone injection for a complicated retinal detachment in the only aphakic eye. At 2 weeks after the intravitreal silicone injection, specular microscopy revealed a mild pleomorphism in the corneal endothelium and an endothelial cell loss of 26%. After 5 months, a small silicone drop floated in the anterior chamber and the first signs of diffuse keratopathy were observed. At the same time, specular microscopy revealed severe damage to the endothelial cells and a cell loss of 69%. After the keratoplasty, scanning electron microscopy of the corneal button showed a filamentous structure of the posterior surface of the cornea, with fibroblast-like cells; the endothelial cells were absent.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Filipec, I Karel, W Pedal, P Haninec. 1989. Specular and scanning electron microscopy in diffuse silicone keratopathy.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02172891

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Model of pulsatile-flow of aqueous humor through the iris-lens canal.

PURPOSE: To present a model of pulsatile-flow of aqueous humor from posterior (PC) to anterior chamber (AC) and to analyze the sensitivity of this novel model in detecting typical high risk conditions predisposing to pupillary block. METHODS: The model assumes noncontinuous flow of aqueous through the iris-lens canal. Aqueous that fills the canal will be ejected toward the AC-side of the canal at certain time intervals, and between 2 events of aqueous ejection there is no actual flow through this canal. Pupillary pumping rate (PPR) was calculated from the aqueous flow rate and the calculated volume of iris-lens canal. RESULTS: PPR values were generated by incorporating pupillary diameter (1 to 8 mm), aqueous flow rate (1 to 2.5 microL/min), and iris-lens canal width (0.5 to 2 mm) and height (3-9 microm) in numerical experimentation with the present model. PPR showed inverse dependence on iris-lens canal height and pupillary diameter and was directly proportional to aqueous flow rate, in agreement with the steady-flow model. However, contrary to the steady-flow model, PPR showed inverse dependence on iris-lens canal width and predicted the anticipated PC-AC pressure gradient changes at simulated light-dark transition in eyes of patients with clinically narrow angles and ultrasound biomicroscopy evidenced pupillary block. CONCLUSIONS: Upon the incorporation of real ultrasound biomicroscopy measurements in numerical experimentations with both models, the present pulsatile-flow model, contrary to the steady-flow model, showed good predictability of PC-AC pressure gradient changes in a typical condition predisposing to pupillary block.

Anterior Chamber↗