PubMed · 2850961
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
V M Smirnov, T N Reznikova. [Interhemispheric artificial stable functional connections].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2850961/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Recent neurobiological models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) posit that a dysfunction in orbitofrontal-subcortical circuitry underlies the etiology of this disorder. Much of the empirical support for these theories comes from studies using neuroimaging techniques to compare brain activity in OCD patients with that in non-OCD controls. Qualitative reviews of this literature implicate the orbitofrontal cortex, caudate nuclei, and thalamus. In this study, a meta-analysis was conducted to summarize the results of studies using positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) to investigate brain activity in OCD. Results suggest that differences in radiotracer uptake between patients with OCD and healthy controls have been found consistently in the orbital gyrus and the head of the caudate nucleus. No other significant differences were found. The implications of these results for theories regarding the etiology of OCD are discussed.
A fundamental question is whether people have available one category learning system, or many. Most multiple systems advocates postulate one explicit and one implicit system. Although there is much agreement about the nature of the explicit system, there is less agreement about the nature of the implicit system. In this article, we review a dual systems theory of category learning called competition between verbal and implicit systems (COVIS) developed by Ashby et al. The explicit system dominates the learning of verbalizable, rule-based category structures and is mediated by frontal brain areas such as the anterior cingulate, prefrontal cortex (PFC), and head of the caudate nucleus. The implicit system, which uses procedural learning, dominates the learning of non-verbalizable, information-integration category structures, and is mediated by the tail of the caudate nucleus and a dopamine-mediated reward signal. We review nine studies that test six a priori predictions from COVIS, each of which is supported by the data.
OBJECTIVE: To study the nigrostriatal pathways in 21 patients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), 19 drug naive Parkinson disease (PD) patients, and 16 controls using a dopaminergic presynaptic ligand [123I]-2beta-carbometoxy-3beta-(4-iodophenyl)-N-(3-fluoropropyl) nortropane (FP-CIT) and SPECT in order to assess similarities or differences between DLB and PD. METHODS: A SPECT scan was carried out 3 to 4 hours after administration of 185 MBq (IV) of FP-CIT. Using occipital cortex as a radioactivity uptake reference, ratios for the caudate nuclei and the anterior and posterior putamina of both hemispheres were calculated. From the FP-CIT binding measurements, asymmetry indices and caudate:putamen ratios were derived. RESULTS: The DLB and PD groups had lower FP-CIT binding in all striatal areas than controls (analysis of variance: p < 0.001 in all measures). DLB patients also had significantly lower binding in the caudate nucleus than the PD patients. There was greater asymmetry of uptake in the posterior putamina of PD patients than DLB patients (p < 0.04) and controls (p < 0.01). The mean caudate:putamen ratio for the DLB group was not significantly different from that of the controls, while the mean caudate:putamen ratio of the PD group was higher than that of the control group (p < 0.001) and the DLB group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed differences between PD and DLB in the pattern of striatal dopaminergic dysfunction. DLB patients do not have the characteristic selective degeneration of ventrolateral nigral neurons seen in PD. This could explain some of the clinical differences between DLB and PD.