PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2887762

Cigarette tar reduction.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Wang. 1987-08-22. Cigarette tar reduction.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(87)90997-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Sensitivity of different bacterial assays in detecting mutagens in urine of humans exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

The urine mutagenicity and excretion of 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OH PYR) in non-smoking psoriatic patients treated topically with coal-tar-based ointments were analysed in order to find the most appropriate procedure for monitoring occupational PAH exposure. The bacterial mutagenicity assays used were the plate incorporation, macro-scale fluctuation and microsuspension tests, all on Salmonella typhimurium strain TA98 in the presence of S9 mix and beta-glucuronidase. The sensitivities of the three assays in detecting mutagenic urinary PAH metabolites were compared. The efficiencies of XAD-2 and C18 resins for concentrating PAH urinary mutagens were evaluated in the microsuspension assay. The plate and fluctuation tests on XAD-2 urine extracts were shown to be insufficiently sensitive to detect low urinary levels of mutagens, being positive on urine samples with very high PAH metabolite content, estimated as more than 30 micrograms/g of creatinine of 1-OH PYR. The microsuspension assay on XAD-2 or, even better, on C18 urine extracts was very sensitive in detecting up to 5 micrograms/g of creatinine of 1-OH PYR. It therefore seems to be applicable to the biological monitoring of most occupational low exposures to coal tar.

Coal Tar

Wood tars allergy, cross-sensitization and coal tar.

In a population of 1883 patients tested for allergic contact dermatitis (1985-1988), a prevalence of 5.4% (103 cases) was seen for wood tars (ICDRG allergen, 12% pet.) sensitization. In this group (n = 103), retrospectively, a combined allergy was seen to wood tars and fragrance mix in 43% and to wood tars and balsam of Peru in 31%. A combined allergy to wood tars and coal tar was seen in 19 patients (18.5%): 14 to liquor carbonis detergens (LCD), 8 to lianthral and 3 to both LCD and lianthral. Within the group with wood tars allergy (n = 103), a minority (n = 37) had a history of atopic dermatitis. Comparison of the test results in atopic and non-atopic subgroups (within the group of 103) revealed a higher incidence of combined wood tars-fragrance mix allergy in the atopic group (n = 37). In this group, a lower incidence of combined wood tars-coal tar sensitization was seen in comparison with the non-atopic group (n = 66). The authors believe that combined "wood tars-coal tar" allergy could be the consequence of cross-sensitization rather than due to long-term previous topical treatment with tar derivatives. The high % of cross-allergy between wood tars and fragrance mix emphasizes the role of wood tars as an important indicator allergen in perfume allergy.

Coal Tar