PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 2893340

KGB: a single buffer for all restriction endonucleases.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M McClelland, J Hanish, M Nelson, Y Patel. 1988-01-11. KGB: a single buffer for all restriction endonucleases.. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar%2F16.1.364

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Phase inversion dynamics of PLGA solutions related to drug delivery.

Dark ground optical microscopy, electron microscopy, and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have been used to quantify the effects of formulation changes on the phase inversion dynamics and in vitro drug release properties of a PLGA-based drug delivery system. Gel growth rates and water influx rates are determined from plots of the square of the respective front motion with time. Results show that additives that accelerate the solution gelation rate at constant morphology result in high initial release rates. Conversely, additives that slow the rate of gelation dramatically reduce the initial drug release rate and lead to a more dense sponge-like morphology. Moreover, the phase inversion dynamics and morphology are the same regardless of whether the solutions are quenched with water, a PBS buffer solution or horse serum.

Buffers

Buffer effects on EcoRV kinetics as measured by fluorescent staining and digital imaging of plasmid cleavage.

We have developed a protocol to quantify polymer DNA cleavage which replaces the traditional radiolabeling and scintillation counting with fluorescent staining and digital imaging. This procedure offers high sensitivity, speed, and convenience, while avoiding waste and error associated with traditional 32P radiolabeling. This protocol was used to measure cleavage of pBR322 plasmid DNA by EcoRV, a type II restriction enzyme. EcoRV was found to exhibit an order of magnitude difference in binding in two apparently similar buffers used in previous investigations. To determine the origin of this effect, we measured reaction kinetics in buffers of different chemical nature and concentration: Tris, bis-Tris propane, Tes, Hepes, and cacodylate. We found that buffer concentration and identity had significant effects on EcoRV reaction velocity through large changes in specific binding and nonspecific binding (reflected in the Michaelis constant Km and the dissociation constant for nonspecific binding Kns). There were only small changes in Vmax. The source of the buffer effect is the protonated amines common to many pH buffers. These buffer cations likely act as counterions screening DNA phosphates, where both the protonated buffer structure and concentration affect enzyme binding strength. It appears that by choosing anionic buffers or zwitterionic buffers with a buried positive charge, buffer influence on the protein binding to DNA can be largely eliminated.

Buffers

A novel strategy for the preparation of liposomes: rapid solvent exchange.

During the preparation of multi-component model membranes, a primary consideration is that compositional homogeneity should prevail throughout the suspension. Some conventional sample preparation methods pass the lipid mixture through an intermediary, solvent-free state. This is an ordered, solid state and may favor the demixing of membrane components. A new preparative method has been developed which is specifically designed to avoid this intermediary state. This novel strategy is called rapid solvent exchange (RSE) and entails the direct transfer of lipid mixtures between organic solvent and aqueous buffer. RSE liposomes require no more than a minute to prepare and manifest considerable entrapment volumes with a high fraction of external surface area. In phospholipid/cholesterol mixtures of high cholesterol content, suspensions prepared by more conventional methods reveal evidence of artifactual demixing, whereas samples prepared by rapid solvent exchange do not. The principles which may lead to artifactual demixing during conventional sample preparation are discussed.

Buffers