PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2908767

What are the differences between the H2-receptor antagonists?

Abstract

The H2-receptor antagonists which are used for ulcer therapy fall into four main structural classes. Cimetidine is an imidazole derivative; ranitidine belongs to the basically substituted furans, famotidine is a member of the guanidinothiazole group; and roxatidine belongs to the aminoalkylphenoxy series. Famotidine is the most potent, selective H2-receptor antagonist yet available for ulcer therapy. On a weight basis, famotidine is approximately eight times more potent than ranitidine and 40 times more potent than cimetidine. Cimetidine, ranitidine and famotidine are competitive antagonists, while the long-acting H2-receptor antagonists, e.g. loxtidine and lamitidine, are insurmountable H2-receptor blockers. Famotidine has a longer duration of action than either ranitidine or cimetidine. Because famotidine does not interact with cytochrome P-450 of the hepatic enzyme system, it does not appear to affect the metabolism of drugs metabolized by this system. The overall number of side-effects of the H2-receptor antagonists is in the range of 2-3% and no irreversible adverse effects are known. Famotidine has been found to be generally well tolerated. In a first post-marketing study, the number of patients with side-effects was only 0.43%. Side-effects such as headache, dizziness, constipation and diarrhoea have been observed only occasionally. Thus, famotidine is a safe and potent H2-receptor blocker of acid secretion.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Schunack. 1987. What are the differences between the H2-receptor antagonists?. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.1987.tb00658.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in bleeding peptic ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Although a previous meta-analysis found that intravenous H2-receptor antagonists were only weakly beneficial in bleeding gastric ulcer and of no benefit in bleeding duodenal ulcer, patients with ulcer bleeding continue to receive such treatment. AIM: To re-evaluate the efficacy of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in ulcer re-bleeding, surgery and mortality by updating the previous meta-analysis. METHODS: After two independent literature searches, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of intravenous H2-receptor antagonists in bleeding ulcer published between 1984 and 2000 were added to those from the initial meta-analysis. Pooled rates of re-bleeding, surgery and death were re-calculated, together with the relative risk reduction, absolute risk reduction, number needed to treat and Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio. RESULTS: Intravenous H2-receptor antagonists did not significantly reduce re-bleeding, surgery or death in bleeding duodenal ulcer. There were small but significant reductions in re-bleeding, surgery and death in bleeding gastric ulcer; the absolute risk reductions were 7.2%, 6.7% and 3.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous H2-receptor antagonists are of no value in bleeding duodenal ulcer, although they may be mildly beneficial in bleeding gastric ulcer. Because proton pump inhibitors have a greater inhibitory effect on gastric acid secretion than H2-receptor antagonists, they may be more effective in ulcer bleeding and should be further evaluated for that indication.

Histamine H2 Antagonists↗