PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 2912068

Identifying pedigrees segregating at a major locus for a quantitative trait: an efficient strategy for linkage analysis.

Abstract

Having found evidence for segregation at a major locus for a quantitative trait, a logical next step is to identify those pedigrees in which major-locus segregation is occurring. If the quantitative trait is a risk factor for an associated disease, identifying such segregating pedigrees can be important in classifying families by etiology, in risk assessment, and in suggesting treatment modalities. Identifying segregating pedigrees can also be helpful in selecting pedigrees to include in a subsequent linkage study to map the major locus. Here, we describe a strategy to identify pedigrees segregating at a major locus for a quantitative trait. We apply this pedigree selection strategy to simulated data generated under a major-locus or mixed model with a rare dominant allele and sampled according to one of several fixed-structure or sequential sampling designs. We demonstrate that for the situations considered, the pedigree selection strategy is sensitive and specific and that a linkage study based only on the pedigrees classified as segregating extracts essentially all the linkage information in the entire sample of pedigrees. Our results suggest that for large-scale linkage studies involving many genetic markers, the savings from this strategy can be substantial and that, compared with fixed-structure sampling, sequential sampling of pedigrees can greatly improve the efficiency for linkage analysis of a quantitative trait.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Boehnke, P P Moll. 1989. Identifying pedigrees segregating at a major locus for a quantitative trait: an efficient strategy for linkage analysis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2912068/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Statistical test to compare the linkage model and the admixture model based on central limit results.

In the Admixture Model, the probability that an individual carries a certain allele at a specific marker depends on the allele frequencies in K ancestral populations and the proportion of the individual's genome originating from these populations. The markers are assumed to be independent. The Linkage Model is a Hidden Markov Model that extends the Admixture Model by incorporating linkage between neighboring loci. We prove consistency and asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators for the ancestry of individuals in the Linkage Model, complementing earlier results by (Pfaff et al., 2004; Pfaffelhuber and Rohde, 2022; Heinzel, 2025) for the Admixture Model. These results are used to prove that a statistical test that allows for model selection between the Admixture Model and the Linkage Model is an asymptotic level-α-test. Finally, we demonstrate the practical relevance of our results by applying the test to real-world data from The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2015).

Genetic Linkage↗

Haplotype thinking in lung disease.

To identify the genetic etiology of a disease of interest, disease-related characteristics (phenotypes) are often tested for association with genetic variants (genotypes). Although genetic association studies of single genetic variants have been widely performed, there has been increasing interest in studies of multiple adjacent genetic variants on one chromosome, known as a haplotype. In this review, we will provide background about the origin of haplotypes and why they can be useful in genetic studies; we will discuss approaches to determining haplotypes and performing haplotype-based genetic association studies; and we will compare single variant and haplotype-based approaches.

Genetic Linkage↗

Associations between DNA markers and resistance to diseases in sugarcane and effects of population substructure.

Association between markers and sugarcane diseases were investigated in a collection of 154 sugarcane clones, consisting of important ancestors or parents, and cultivars. 1,068 polymorphic AFLP and 141 SRR markers were scored across all clones. Data on the four most important diseases in the Australian sugarcane industry were obtained; these diseases being pachymetra root rot (Pachymetra chaunorhiza B.J. Croft & M.W. Dick), leaf scald (Xanthomonas albilineans Dowson), Fiji leaf gall (Fiji disease virus), and smut (Ustilago scitaminea H. & P. Sydow). By a simple regression analysis, association between markers and diseases could be readily detected. However, many of these associations were due to the effects of embedded population structure and random effects. After taking population structure into account, we found that 59% of the phenotypic variation in smut resistance ratings could be accounted for by 11 markers, 32% of variation for leaf scald and pachymetra root rot rating by 4 markers, and 26% of Fiji leaf gall by 5 markers. The results suggest that marker-trait associations can be readily detected in populations generated from modern sugarcane breeding programs. This may be due to special features of past sugarcane breeding programs leading to persistent linkage disequilibrium in modern parental populations.

Genetic Linkage↗