PubMed · 2959971
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D McDonald. 1987. Postpartum sit-ups.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj%2F67.11.1765
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A collagen tissue polymer composite manufactured in sheep and prepared in two different forms (wet and dry) was compared to polypropylene mesh and to a control group for effectiveness in the repair of an abdominal wall defect in a rabbit model. The wet and dry patches were shown to differ significantly in their pore size. The wet material was shown to retain its natural porosity and promoted neovascularization, tissue integration, cellular infiltration, and neomatrix formation compared to the dry collagen-polymer patch. This material was superior to the polypropylene mesh implant, which was associated with significant adhesions. The appearance of type VI collagen was the earliest sign of new cell infiltration and neomatrix formation within the implant. New deposition of type VI collagen was apparent throughout the thickness of the implant within 4 weeks, followed by type III collagen accumulation. Decreased porosity of the collagen component in the dry patches resulted in a totally nonintegrated implant. This induced a foreign-body capsule with minimal cellular tissue infiltration and no deposition of collagen types VI and III within the implant.
STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical model of the lumbar spine was used to calculate the effects of abdominal muscle coactivation on spinal stability. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effects of abdominal muscle coactivation on lumbar spine stability, muscle fatigue rate, and lumbar spine compression forces. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The activation of human trunk muscles has been found to involve coactivation of antagonistic muscles, which has not been adequately predicted by biomechanical models. Antagonistic activation of abdominal muscles might produce flexion moments resulting from abdominal pressurization. Qualitatively, antagonistic activity also has been attributed to the need to stabilize the spine. METHODS: Spinal loads and spinal stability were calculated for maximum and submaximum (40%, 60% and 80%) efforts in extension and lateral bending using a previously published, anatomically realistic biomechanical model of the lumbar spine and its musculature. Three different antagonistic abdominal muscle coactivation patterns were imposed, and results were compared with those found in a model with no imposed coactivation. RESULTS: Results were quantified in terms of the sum of cubed muscle stresses (sigma sigma m3, which is related to the muscle fatigue rate), the maximum compressive loading on the lumbar spine, and the critical value of the muscle stiffness parameter (q) required for the spine to be stable. Forcing antagonistic coactivation increased stability, but at the cost of an increase in sigma sigma m3 and a small increase in maximum spinal compression. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses provide estimates of the effects of antagonistic abdominal muscle coactivation, indicating that its probable role is to stabilize the spine.
Epigastric vessels were inadvertently injured during placement of instrument portals in 3 horses undergoing laparoscopy for bilateral cryptorchidectomy, bilateral ovariectomy, and removal of electrode wires surgically implanted in the large colon. The resulting hemorrhage increased surgery time, caused hematoma formation or hemoperitoneum, and obscured the surgical field. Hemostasis was achieved by direct pressure or vessel ligation. This complication can be attributed to the high degree of vascularity of the ventral aspect of the abdominal wall.