PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3046010

Vascular graft selection.

Abstract

Twenty to thirty per cent of patients with arterial injuries and some patients with venous injuries require interpositional grafting. The first choice of grafting material for both arterial and venous injuries is autogenous vein. Injuries to large vessels such as the aorta and superior vena cava may necessitate synthetic prostheses. Synthetic aortic prostheses have excellent long-term patency rates, but the same materials are much less likely to remain patent in the vena cava. Panel or spiral grafts constructed from saphenous vein appear to be the best replacement for this vessel. Autogenous veins are present in different diameters ranging from a mean of 6.4 mm in the saphenous vein to a mean of 1.8 cm in the internal jugular vein. The thickest autogenous vein is the saphenous vein, and thus it is preferred for medium-sized and small arteries. The authors prefer the larger 7.5-mm cephalic vein for replacement of medium-sized veins. In the absence of suitable saphenous vein, the cephalic vein is also the choice for arterial interposition grafts. Although there are few reports of the use of arterial autografts in vascular trauma, the surgeon should be aware that autografts may be ideal for vascular injuries in children and for isolated injuries with severe contamination. Finally, the use of synthetic grafts in injuries where adequate tissue coverage is not possible may result in immediate limb salvage, but the incidence of limb loss in this situation will be extremely high.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Thomas, G E Pierce, J I Iliopoulos, A S Hermreck. 1988. Vascular graft selection.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(16)44591-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prospective research on musculoskeletal disorders in office workers (PROMO): study protocol.

BACKGROUND: This article describes the background and study design of the PROMO study (Prospective Research on Musculoskeletal disorders in Office workers). Few longitudinal studies have been performed to investigate the risk factors responsible for the incidence of hand, arm, shoulder and neck symptoms among office workers, given the observation that a large group of office workers might be at risk worldwide. Therefore, the PROMO study was designed. The main aim is to quantify the contribution of exposure to occupational computer use to the incidence of hand, arm, shoulder and neck symptoms. The results of this study might lead to more effective and/or cost-efficient preventive interventions among office workers. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective cohort study is conducted, with a follow-up of 24 months. In total, 1821 participants filled out the first questionnaire (response rate of 74%). Data on exposure and outcome is collected using web-based self-reports. Outcome assessment takes place every three months during the follow-up period. Data on computer use are collected at baseline and continuously during follow-up using a software program. DISCUSSION: The advantages of the PROMO study include the long follow-up period, the repeated measurement of both exposure and outcome, and the objective measurement of the duration of computer use. In the PROMO study, hypotheses stemming from lab-based and field-based research will be investigated.

Arm Injuries↗