PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3046227

Congenital middle ear malformations.

Abstract

After a profound review of normal embryology, a systematical and topographical classification of congenital middle ear malformations in general and of meatal atresia in particular is proposed; the classification of congenital aural atresia is essentially based on the recognition of two types according to the course of the facial nerve in its third segment: in type I, a normal topography of the facial nerve is found and consequently, the middle ear anomalies are rather minimal; in type II, an antero-superior displacement of the facial nerve in its third segment is recognized and the middle ear malformations are considerable worse. In this report, also attention is paid to syndromal nosology and its genetic aspects. In view of functional surgical; reconstruction, the technique of allograft canal surgery, similar to our combined approach tympanoplasty technique, is described in detail and compared with other classical techniques. Preoperative as well as postoperative problems and complications are extensively discussed. The excellent results of our technique are proposed even after 25 years of experience. An overview of cosmetic surgery techniques is given and also alternative techniques with implantable auditory prosthetic materials are summarized.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J E Marquet, F Declau, M De Cock, K De Paep, B Appel, L Moeneclaey. 1988. Congenital middle ear malformations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3046227/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Demographics, psychiatric diagnoses, and other characteristics of North American Deaf and hard-of-hearing inpatients.

This study examined demographic and clinical data from a specialty deaf inpatient unit so as to better understand characteristics of severely and chronically mentally ill deaf people. The study compares deaf and hearing psychiatric inpatients on demographic variables, psychiatric discharge diagnoses, a language assessment measure, a cognitive ability measure, and a measure of psychosocial functioning and risk of harm to self and others. Overall, findings indicate a broader range of diagnoses than in past studies with posttraumatic stress disorder being the most common diagnosis. Compared with hearing patients in the same hospital, deaf patients were less likely to be diagnosed with a psychotic or substance abuse disorder and more likely to be diagnosed with a mood, anxiety, personality, or developmental disorder. Psychosocial functioning of the deaf patients was generally similar to hearing psychiatric patients. Deaf patients presented significantly higher risks than hearing patients in areas of self-harm and risk of sexual offending. Cognitive scores show that both the deaf and hearing inpatient population is skewed toward persons who are lower functioning. An additional surprising finding was that 75% of deaf individuals fell into the nonfluent range of communication in American Sign Language.

Deafness↗