PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 3049638

Scaphoid nonunion.

Abstract

Scaphoid nonunion is common, but the exact pathophysiology of this complication is unclear. Explanations include lack of treatment, poor initial treatment, delay in diagnosis, synovial fluid dynamics, precarious vascularity, fracture displacement, and carpal instability. Currently, the diagnosis is best confirmed by classic changes on plain radiographs, instability testing, arthrography, and arthroscopy in selected cases. Nine carpal bones are not benign. The natural history of scaphoid nonunion is one of progressive arthritis. Attempts at obtaining bony healing are therefore recommended. In treating established nonunions without arthritis, the Russe bone graft technique is the mainstay of treatment. A union rate of 90 per cent is to be expected. Electrical stimulation is an alternative when there is no synovial pseudarthrosis or scaphoid collapse deformity, or if a previous Russe graft has failed. If a significant humpback scaphoid or collapse deformity is present, internal fixation with the Herbert screw and scaphoid reconstruction with a bone graft are our choices. Healing rates are less than those with the Russe graft, but one may achieve improved motion of the wrist and earlier return to function. When scaphoid nonunion is accompanied by degenerative arthritis, salvage procedures are recommended. Radial styloidectomy is a simple procedure that will preserve motion and buy time. Soft tissue interposition with excision of a small proximal pole is useful, particularly if no collapse deformity is present. Silicone replacement alone has fallen into increasing disfavor because of the high incidence of subluxation and silicone synovitis. Combining silicone replacement with intercarpal fusion (the SLAC procedure) may lessen these complications. Proximal row carpectomy is another procedure that may preserve motion, though often at the expense of weakness, particularly in the younger patient requiring significant grip strength. In these cases, standard wrist fusion seems the most predictable alternative.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A L Osterman, M Mikulics. 1988. Scaphoid nonunion.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3049638/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dry reagent dipstick test combined with 23S rRNA PCR for molecular diagnosis of bacterial infection in arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic joint infections present a challenging problem in orthopaedics. Conventional methods for detection of arthroplasty infections rely on bacterial culture of synovial fluid aspirates. During recent years, however, molecular tests that are based on DNA amplification by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by electrophoretic analysis of the products, have been introduced. We report a simple and inexpensive assay that allows visual detection and confirmation of the PCR-amplified sequences by hybridization within minutes. The assay is performed in a dry reagent dipstick format (strip) and does not require special instrumentation. Universal primers are used for PCR of the 23S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene. The biotinylated amplification product is hybridized with dA-tailed probes that are specific for six pathogens commonly involved in periprosthetic joint infections. The mixture is applied to the strip, which is then immersed in the appropriate buffer. The buffer migrates along the strip by capillary action and rehydrates gold nanoparticles with oligo(dT) strands attached to their surface. The nanoparticles bind to the target DNA through hybridization, and the hybrids are captured by immobilized streptavidin at the test zone of the strip, producing a characteristic red line. Unbound nanoparticles are captured by immobilized oligo(dT) strands at the control zone of the strip, generating a second line. The dipstick test was applied to the detection of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterococcus faesium, and Haemophilus influenza. Twelve samples of synovial fluids from patients were analyzed for the detection and identification of the infection caused by the six pathogens. The results were compared with bacterial cultures.

Arthroplasty↗